Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會及文化語言 · 6 years ago

求教求救!幫忙翻譯!

I am further enforced in this view by the general principle that the court’s supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration should be less rather than more. The power to intervene is defined by statute and a non-interventionist philosophy is encouraged in issues concerning when such a power arises.

This not being an award, there is no power to set it aside.

The remaining issue, therefore, is whether Gingerbread has been able to demonstrate that the arbitrator misconducted himself when finding that Cheung Kong and Citybase were acting as agents for Gingerbread.

14 Answers

Rating
  • 6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    ENG:

    I am further enforced in this view by the general principle that the court’s supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration should be less rather than more. The power to intervene is defined by statute and a non-interventionist philosophy is encouraged in issues concerning when such a power arises.

    This not being an award, there is no power to set it aside.

    The remaining issue, therefore, is whether Gingerbread has been able to demonstrate that the arbitrator misconducted himself when finding that Cheung Kong and Citybase were acting as agents for Gingerbread.

    中文:

    我進一步強制執行這一觀點的一般原則,即法院和仲裁的監督管轄權應少而不是更多。干預的權力是由法律規定和不干預的理念是鼓勵有關當這樣的電源出現問題。這不是一個獎項,有沒有權力放在一邊。剩下的問題,因此,這是薑餅是否已經能夠證明發現,長江實業及港基分別充當薑餅代理時,仲裁員行為不當。

    HOPE I CAN HELP YOU ^_^

    Source(s): Google Translate
  • 6 years ago

    法院的監督對仲裁管轄權應該是較少而不是更多的一般原則,我們進一步要在此視圖中遵守。進行干預的權力由規約 》 和非干涉主義哲學鼓勵在問題時產生了這種權力。

    這不是獎勵,沒有力量,放在一邊。

    餘下的問題,因此,是姜餅是否已經能夠證明仲裁員女色時發現長江實業和港基被作為代理人姜餅。

  • 6 years ago

    英文

    I am further enforced in this view by the general principle that the court’s supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration should be less rather than more. The power to intervene is defined by statute and a non-interventionist philosophy is encouraged in issues concerning when such a power arises.

    This not being an award, there is no power to set it aside.

    The remaining issue, therefore, is whether Gingerbread has been able to demonstrate that the arbitrator misconducted himself when finding that Cheung Kong and Citybase were acting as agents for Gingerbread.

    翻譯為中文

    我進一步強制執行這一觀點的一般原則,即法院和仲裁的監督管轄權應少而不是更多。干預的權力是由法律規定和不干預的理念是鼓勵有關當這樣的電源出現問題。

    這不是一個獎項,有沒有權力放在一邊。

    剩下的問題,因此,這是薑餅是否已經能夠證明發現,長江實業及港基分別充當薑餅代理時,仲裁員行為不當。

  • 6 years ago

    英文

    I am further enforced in this view by the general principle that the court’s supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration should be less rather than more. The power to intervene is defined by statute and a non-interventionist philosophy is encouraged in issues concerning when such a power arises.

    This not being an award, there is no power to set it aside.

    The remaining issue, therefore, is whether Gingerbread has been able to demonstrate that the arbitrator misconducted himself when finding that Cheung Kong and Citybase were acting as agents for Gingerbread.

    翻譯為中文

    我進一步強制執行這一觀點的一般原則,即法院和仲裁的監督管轄權應少而不是更多。干預的權力是由法律規定和不干預的理念是鼓勵有關當這樣的電源出現問題。

    這不是一個獎項,有沒有權力放在一邊。

    剩下的問題,因此,這是薑餅是否已經能夠證明發現,長江實業及港基分別充當薑餅代理時,仲裁員行為不當。

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 6 years ago

    我進一步強制執行這一觀點的一般原則,即法院和仲裁的監督管轄權應少而不是更多。干預的權力是由法律規定和不干預的理念是鼓勵有關當這樣的電源出現問題。

    這不是一個獎項,有沒有權力放在一邊。

    剩下的問題,因此,這是薑餅是否已經能夠證明發現,長江實業及港基分別充當薑餅代理時,仲裁員行為不當。

    2014-12-29 22:33:25 補充:

    希望能幫到你i hope i can help you

    2014-12-29 22:40:01 補充:

    希望能幫到你i hope i can help you!

  • 6 years ago

    ed_young 很久不見了~

    謹祝大家新年進步!

    ╭∧---∧╮

    │ .✪‿✪ │

    ╰/) ⋈ (\\╯

  • 6 years ago

    我在這視野藉著一般的原則更進一步被執行在仲裁上的法院的管理司法權應該比較不,而非多。干涉的力量被法令定義,而且關於如此的力量何時發生一種非干涉主義的哲學在議題被鼓勵。

    Source(s): 網址
  • 6 years ago

    English

    I am further enforced in this view by the general principle that the court’s supervisory jurisdiction over arbitration should be less rather than more. The power to intervene is defined by statute and a non-interventionist philosophy is encouraged in issues concerning when such a power arises.

    This not being an award, there is no power to set it aside.

    The remaining issue, therefore, is whether Gingerbread has been able to demonstrate that the arbitrator misconducted himself when finding that Cheung Kong and Citybase were acting as agents for Gingerbread.

    中文

    我進一步強制執行這一觀點的一般原則,即法院和仲裁的監督管轄權應少而不是更多。干預的權力是由法律規定和不干預的理念是鼓勵有關當這樣的電源出現問題。這不是一個獎項,有沒有權力放在一邊。剩下的問題,因此,這是薑餅是否已經能夠證明發現,長江實業及港基分別充當薑餅代理時,仲裁員行為不當。

  • 6 years ago

    "法院對仲裁的監管權宜少不宜多" 的一般原則增強了我這觀點。法律規定了干預的權力,也鼓勵使用 "不干預" 的哲理去處理需要用這種權力的問題。仲裁員的決定不像是一個獎項,法院沒有權力將它放在一邊。剩下的問題,因此,是 Gingerbread 是否已經能夠證明,仲裁員在裁決長江實業及港基只是 Gingerbread 的代理時,有不當的行為。不當的行為

    在 [亞洲建設] 對 [太平洋皇冠]( 1988) 44 BLR 135 一案中 , 對於是否去除仲裁員有如下的決定性測試:

    “一個合理的人有沒有任何理由認為有一個真正的可能性,仲裁員不能,或者不會,在援引的問題上,根據提交給他的證據或論據,公平地做出決定?"

    2014-12-30 10:04:21 補充:

    我最近一直忙於工作,希望明年能有更多的時間在這裡。

    祝大家新年健康快樂 !

    Source(s): My past learning
  • 6 years ago

    我進一步強制執行這一觀點的一般原則,即法院和仲裁的監督管轄權應少而不是更多。干預的權力是由法律規定和不干預的理念是鼓勵有關當這樣的電源出現問題。

    這不是一個獎項,有沒有權力放在一邊。

    剩下的問題,因此,這是薑餅是否已經能夠證明發現,長江實業及港基分別充當薑餅代理時,仲裁員行為不當。

    Source(s): google translate
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.