Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureRoyalty · 6 years ago

Regarding the children of Andrew Parker Bowles that Camilla bore...?

will they appear on the palace balcony on the day that she is crowned Queen?

Update:

Have the Parker Bowles children ever spoken publically about their feelings regarding their mother's extramarital affair with Prince Charles?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    For years, Tom Parker-Bowles was so embarrassed by his mother's whorish behavior, that he dropped "Bowles" from his name to disassociate himself from his mother.

    He later reinstated it when he was offered a job as a food critic on one condition, they wanted him to go back to "Parker-Bowles" so that they could use the notoriety of his name to boost sales. Having few job prospects, he agreed.

    It was Tom Parker-Bowles presence at St. Paul's that was so jarring to Diana on her wedding day. Not Camilla's. Diana knew Camilla would be there well in advance. Tom was the big surprise. Very few children attend royal weddings. Usually those who are members of the bridal party are the only children in attendance.

    Why was Tom Parker-Bowles there? Why would Tom be invited when children in Diana's family were left out? People assumed it was Camilla's presence Diana was referring to when she said seeing Camilla in a gray hat with Tom standing on a chair next to her made her heart sink. It was in fact Tom's presence that was disturbing to her. It confirmed the rumours she had heard shortly before the wedding that he was Charles' son.

  • 6 years ago

    If there is any grace left in the world, they will crown Charles and not her. A consort need not be crowned, and many have not been given the honour. It's interesting that either of them have the nerve to show their face in public. Must be very humiliating for the children on both sides of that adulterous relationship.

  • Clo
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    It depends on the amount of people Charles wants to make a balcony appearance. He may only want his sons, their wives and children on the balcony, limiting it to immediate family of the monarch.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 years ago

    I'd imagine both Prince Charles and his wife would realise doing this would be highly inflamatory. So no.

    Only those immediately involved would know how her children felt about her relationship with Charles and why in the world would they 'speak publically' about that??

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 6 years ago

    Camilla is our next Queen consort whether u like it or not. Better get use to it. There ain't gonna be no riot. There ain't gonna be no storming of the palace on coronation day by a disgruntled mob or a bunch american housewives Diana fans.

    We Brits like to have a moan and that's it. It's over we then get on with life. Hope the weather is good for the day and all that.

  • They very well might. Although they will never be royal, they are the future Queen's children, and there is no reason why they should not be at their mother's side when she is crowned Queen.

    Tom Parker-Bowles allegedly was 'pissed off' according to this article:

    http://m.theepochtimes.com/n3/1047290-tom-parker-b...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.