Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 5 years ago

Impeachment - Do you think that trading four enemy Generals for a PFC during wartime is grounds for Obama impeachment?

... as in giving aid to the enemy?

Particularly, considering Obama's refusal to address the ISIS question a year ago despite warnings from his military advisers, giving ISIS a "major military advantage?" And.... with a "NO WIN" scenario of using air power alone to defeat ISIS?

15 Answers

Relevance
  • 5 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I find it interesting that both before AND after giving 5 (not 4) high level terrorist in trade for a deserter, US policy was to NOT negotiate with terrorist, to the point the government stopped the family of one of the recent beheadings from collecting money to pay the terrorist the million dollar ransom they asked for.

    Sadly, I do not see this as Obama being ignorant or incompetent but a well thought out way to accomplish an agenda contrary to the US Constitution and contrary to the good of the US.

  • ROFLMAO. Traded four goatherds for a pfc, is more like it. ISIS is not a threat to America. FYI, genius, trying to fight an idea, is a "no win" scenario. It amazes me how connies answer to everything is to throw away American lives and tax dollars at everyone else's problems too.

    • Lv 6
      5 years agoReport

      "An idea?" Do you live on a cave?

  • The real problem in the US is that a majority of people actually voted for him twice. We don't need to impeach Obama, the people that elected him will only put in another just like or worse than him.

  • 5 years ago

    Obama is not working for the American people, he works for very evil Satanic overlords who wish pain and suffering to America. All 3 branches have been subverted. Even the republicans are part of this evil. Why are they not screaming to heaven about allowing infected planes into America? Because they are all in on the conspiracy to destroy the constitution and replace it with Satan's anarchy.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Huh?
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    No, because none of those acts constitute grounds for impeachment as described in the Constitution. Unlike the haters that call for the President's imeachment those of us that SUPPORT the Constittion of the United States would not consider such a clearly Un-Constitutional coup.

    • Bigham
      Lv 5
      5 years agoReport

      Actually...he kinda has a point. It's not that much of a stretch to consider giving back 5 high ranking enemy leaders as aiding the enemy.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    There are too many pending issues put to 2015 before we waste more millions on impeachment.

    Beohner has border crises, tax code rewrite, immigration reform, and campaigning for the 2016 presidential election that has been pushed until after the elections to deal with first.

  • y
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    Apparently, they weren't, aren't, or can't be enemy Generals, they were just innocent men that were misunderstood. The PFC was a very valuable soldier, I mean, the administration even has their own general in place to review the investigation and correct the record in case the military, goes astray.

    • y
      Lv 7
      5 years agoReport

      Sarcasm jimbo, sarcasm.

  • alex
    Lv 4
    5 years ago

    Without John Boehner's support, there will be no impeachment.

    Attachment image
  • 5 years ago

    Yes

  • 5 years ago

    Prisoner swaps after a war is common practice. A lot of people seem to be unaware of the fact Taliban members were classified as POW and al-Qaeda fighters were classified as enemy combatants.

    • Huh?
      Lv 7
      5 years agoReport

      The war in Afganistan is winding down and prisoner exchanges do occur while the war is still going on. Beside the prisoners were not released, they were turned over to the custody of another country.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.