Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 6 years ago

Why do libs seem to forget that Sen, Hillary Clinton voted for the war in Iraq and that Billy said Saddam had WMD's?

Youtube thumbnail

The video up top is Billy himself saying Saddam had weapons of Mass Destruction..(2000 gallons of anthrax!) The bottom video is of Hillary saying it. ARGUE THAT ONE LIBS!!! PROOF IN YOUR FACE!!

Youtube thumbnail

16 Answers

  • RJC
    Lv 7
    6 years ago
    Favorite Answer


    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

    --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

    --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

    --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

    "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

    --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

    "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

    Letter to President Clinton, signed by:

    -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

    -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

    -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

    "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

    Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."

    -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

    -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"

    -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

    -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."

    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

  • 6 years ago

    When Bill Clinton said that, it was true. Then Saddam after seeing what happened in Libya got rid of all his. He just didn't want Iran to know about it. UN inspectors were allowed to inspect Iraq and never found a thing.

    After 911 the testimony of one single liar was used as evidence to invade the country. cheney, Rumsfeld, wolfwitz were aware of it and lied to bush who lied to powell who tried to sell it to the UN.

    The UN didn't buy it and neither did Canada and many other countries we consider best friends. When Colin Powell discovered the lie, he resigned after a period that wouldn't embarrass bush.

    Hillary like a lot of senators and reps were sold the same lie and voted accordingly. She couldn't believe a president and his cabinet would be so deceitful. Now we all know.

    • Lv 7
      6 years agoReport

      True, but I am not sure how much G. W. Bush really knew. I am not sure that he was in the loop.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 6 years ago

    Because democratics are about image only. Actually, they aren't really democrats as much as they are anti-Republicans

    They watch "safe" media outlets that are committed to not bringing these stories to the forefront at any time, then or now. They won't watch FOX news because they can't stand the truth about "their guy(s)". In their world, if you can bury it before it gets out, or just show it once, it never happened.

    I can guarantee you that they are pissed that you drudged this up.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    Dims make me physically sick. They all vote to go into Iraq, then when it goes sideways they try to throw the war, then we do the Surge, it worked, and now Hussein has lost Iraq to the muslim terrorists because he failed to negotiate a deal with Iraqis to build a base and have troops there, just like we do all over the world doing the same damn thing.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Iraq had them in 1998, Bubba kicked Sadman's butt in 4 days and destroyed his desire to pursue WMD's

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    They haven't forgotten that.. No one in Congress voted for a 'war' in Iraq. They voted to give the president to use force, if necessary..They voted to use force because of the data that they were given. Saddam did have WMD in 1998, but we could not find them in 2003..even after we were told that 'we know where they are and that we have seen them." oops! Congess has not declared war since WWII.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 6 years ago

    We don't forget that. The thing is, the resolution they were voting on was based on quick action. "Weeks, not months" remember?

    Had Clinton known it would devolve into a decade long occupation of Iraq that was nearly entirely fruitless, I'll bet she would've voted differently.

    Not many people disagreed with going into Iraq, it was staying there for 8 years that caused peoples' opinions to go sour.

    Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld:

    "Any war with Iraq would be swift and not require a full US mobilization" (February 2003)

  • 6 years ago

    Why do you think Obama beat Hillary in 08?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 6 years ago

    Democrats are allowed to lie. They're good at it.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    Democrats don't want to talk about that.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    You must live in the 1990s.

    Hussein had no WMDs in the 21st Century.

    Bush/Cheney lied. It's been proven.

    Be a Chess player. Don't just be a Checkers player.

    • ...Show all comments
    • Lv 7
      6 years agoReport

      They got shipped to Syria, that's how the syrians magically started gassing each other about a year or two ago, you remember Dim.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.