so do i

Question

1. A: I am poor at basketball. I never play it. B: __________. I like baseball more than basketball. (a)So do I (b) I don't ,either
2. A: I have no idea  how to make pies. B: Do you? ________. (A) So do I (B) Neither do I.
3.That boy ________ lives next door to me. He is my classmates, too.
   (A) has red hair (B) who give me a hand (C) with the lovely hair (D)on a blue shirt
謝謝解惑

Louis · Accepted Answer

本人讚同羅莉大師的意見。第三題只能選答案C，因為that boy應受到［修飾語］的限定：with the lovely hair。選項D如果用介系詞in，才是另一個可選的答案。

選A的話，會讓句子有了兩組無關的述部。語法錯誤。只有加上who讓其成為形容詞子句才能用。

這題的選項是兩類，一類用形容詞子句但一個缺了關係代名詞，一個是用錯了動詞變化，一類是用介系詞片語，但一個用錯了介系詞。

2014-04-17 12:52:38 補充：
He dressed himself carefully in his Sunday best.
... a Chinese girl in (her) native dress
She always dress in black.
穿(著)[...的]衣服
p.421 <新世紀英漢辭典>

2014-04-17 13:03:36 補充：
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dress

請參見上頁例句裡所用的介系詞。

邏輯：當你穿上某種衣服後,你是在衣服的裡面

2014-04-17 13:05:25 補充：
［插入語］不可能是一個［述部］。

2014-04-17 13:07:35 補充：
［領帶］與［襯衫］的搭配，才是on的關係。但人不在衣服的上面。

2014-04-17 13:19:35 補充：
http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/dress_2

請DSW大師參考本頁的usage note

2014-04-17 17:52:03 補充：
既然DSW大師堅持第三題無誤，我只好跳出來當壞人了。

2014-04-17 17:55:55 補充：
1. A: I am poor at basketball. I never play it. 
B: __________. I like baseball more than basketball. 
(a)So do I (b) I don't, either

2. A: I have no idea how to make pies. Do you?
B:  ________. 
(A) So do I (B) Neither do I.

3.That boy ________ lives next door to me.  He is my classmates, too.
  (A) has red hair (B) who give me a hand (C) with the lovely hair  (D) on a blue shirt

2014-04-17 17:58:36 補充：
3. That boy has red hair and lives net door to me.
兩個述部時，要用連接詞，否則成了run-on sentence，是錯誤的。

2014-04-17 17:59:00 補充：
typo: ...next ...

2014-04-17 18:05:02 補充：
第三題的介系詞片語在當前面那個名詞boy的修飾語時，不能像DSW大師所說，用逗號將其與名詞隔開。只有非限定的同位語，或非限定的修飾語（使用形容詞子句時），才會用逗號。

2014-04-18 11:49:51 補充：
1. When he was five , he____lost in a moonless night. Since then, he has been afraid of th dark. (a)got (b)has got 
請問是(a)嗎? 
是的，因為時間點是他五歲那時（過去）
但b-從過去到現在的經驗?
是的。因為since then給了起點，算到現在為止。

2014-04-18 11:51:41 補充：
2.When Mark got home, his wife _________dinner for his family.
 (a) had cooked (b)has cooked(持續到mark回家才煮完?) 請問是a嗎? 
這是指過去的單一事件，且有時差，所以時間在前的要用過去完成式（a）。

2014-04-18 11:53:56 補充：
3.When my parents came to visit me in London, they asked me _____I could spend some time showing them around.
 (a)that (b)if (c)where

應該選(B)，因為這是名詞子句當直接受詞，用if時，意思是［是否］，才能合乎上下文意。

Anonymous · Answer

參考下面的網址看看

http://phi008780430.pixnet.net/blog

友茂 · Answer

不好意思~可以再冒昧請教各位大師幾個問題嗎~
1. When he was five , he____lost in a moonless night. Since then, he has been afraid of th dark. (a)got (b)has got 
   請問是(a)嗎? 但b-從過去到現在的經驗?
2.When Mark got home, his wife _________dinner for his family.
  (a) had cooked (b)has cooked(持續到mark回家才煮完?) 請問是a嗎?

請問是a嗎? 
謝謝您們!!

2014-04-18 03:36:41 補充：
另外還有最後一題(真的非常謝謝您們)
3.When my parents came to visit me in London, they asked me _____I could spend some time showing them around.
  (a)that (b)if (c)where 
這題我翻找字典,覺得答案應該是a,不知對不對

DaSaGwa · Answer

master 羅莉 !

If (C) is the right answer, why not (D)?  Wrong preposition, shall be "with a blue shirt"?

2014-04-17 09:51:02 補充：
In my opinion, Q#3 is not really a good one, if you can ONLY choose ONE answer.  To me, (A) (C) (D) are all acceptable.

2014-04-17 09:51:54 補充：
However, the standard answer might be (A).  After all, (C) and (D) are the same things.

2014-04-17 09:52:48 補充：
The only thing you can argue not to choose (D) is the preposition "on".  It is better to use "with".

2014-04-17 09:53:37 補充：
Anyway, to me, this kind of test is really bothersome.

2014-04-17 11:58:41 補充：
但一個用錯了介系詞

Not so quick!

What color tie goes on a blue shirt?
What color tie goes with a blue shirt?
White also looks good on a blue shirt.

2014-04-17 12:03:19 補充：
Tell me why you have to use "in" or "with" but not "on"?

with a blue shirt,
on a blue shirt, 
in a blue shirt,

2014-04-17 13:23:38 補充：
I don't mean complement = parenthesis.

I mean prepositional phrase acts as an adjective, like complement (I use "like," not "act as" or "serve as").  
However, when you use " , ", then it is parenthesis.

I am sorry that I didn't state this clearly.

2014-04-17 13:28:35 補充：
master Louis!

Now you want to talk about "logic".

The sentence CAN mean. " (the photo of) that boy on a blue shirt …"

2014-04-17 13:29:27 補充：
I am NOT trying to argue my way, but just to let you see how I see it when I read the sentence.

2014-04-17 13:30:03 補充：
This is why I have those examples of using different prepositions.

2014-04-17 13:31:24 補充：
The question itself is NOT made very nicely, so we can take the meaning of the sentence at different angles.

2014-04-17 13:35:34 補充：
I certainly know the logic of "但人不在衣服的上面".  However, when I read the sentence, since it uses "on", I immediately react to "(the photo of) that boy on …"

2014-04-17 13:38:18 補充：
To me, this kind of sentence is what I encounter in my daily conversation with Americans.  Due to the mutual understanding of the context, some words are curtailed, but it doesn't cause misunderstanding.

2014-04-17 13:41:03 補充：
Like the choice (A) in Q#3, without "who" is likely the way people use in conversation.

2014-04-17 13:44:22 補充：
The kind of grammar you have mentioned is very basic, I am sure I know them well.  Not to give you a bad impression about my grammar knowledge, I have to give you the idea how I look at those 4 choices in Q#3.

2014-04-17 14:19:10 補充：
I also know, to answer question like this, I shall NOT alter or imagine.  However, I feel sorry for Taiwan students to learn this kind of restricted English.  After all, in the real world, besides choice (B), the rest can ALL possibly be used in a different scenario.

2014-04-17 14:22:14 補充：
If poster goes out to talk with English speaking people, and tells them (A) and (D) are NOT the right use.  it can puzzle the listeners.   Maybe, in a test, (A) and (D) has their grammatical and logical problem.

2014-04-17 14:24:53 補充：
However, in my opinion, poster shall know with some minor corrections, they can be all correct uses.  This is why I don't have that much faith in grammar.  After all, grammar is dead (fixed), but the English users are NOT.

2014-04-17 14:27:40 補充：
We cannot use fixed rules to constrain a dynamic brain of a user in using English.

2014-04-17 21:23:35 補充：
You don't need to be a bad guy!  Let me remove my answer, so you will be the good guy!

? · Answer

不贊同DSG的第3題解答.
選項A缺關代who(考試不可自己加上), 造成一句雙動詞, 這正是它的錯處;
with xxx用作修飾名詞時, 直接後位修飾即可, 無需前後加逗號, 故C為正解.

with xxx前後加逗號, 通常是用作副詞片語, 例如:
The boy, with his abundant common sense, solved the problem immediately.

2014-04-17 09:42:02 補充：
= The boy solved the problem immediately with his abundant common sense.
= With his abundant common sense, the boy solved the problem immediately.

2014-04-18 15:11:21 補充：
Louis跳出來當壞人, DSG刪答把Louis變回好人
卻把我變成了壞人, 因為是我開的投指出第3題答錯所造成的結果
但我可沒有要DSG刪答的本意唷! 我只是要她做補充訂正而已
沒想到引出她的一堆強辯硬拗, 我老天!

DSG, 關於選項A, 即使在妳的日常生活中有一百個朋友不用who, 他們也全都是錯的, 因為另有九十九萬九千九百人都正確的用who, 即使不用who也一定是拆成兩句用He/She. . 
關於選項B, 基本動詞變化錯誤, 要用gave或gives才對.

2014-04-18 15:20:03 補充：
關於選項D the photo of) that boy on a blue shirt lives.....
這更是大錯特錯,相片怎會住隔壁?
就算妳意思是「藍襯衫上面(相片)的那個人」,也不會是that boy on a blue shirt,而應是the boy whose picture is on a blue shirt..
英語人士聽到that boy on a blue shirt最直接的理解是「站/坐在藍襯衫上面的那個男孩」,但語意奇怪,怎會站/坐在襯衫上面?
that boy in a blue shirt「穿藍襯衫的那個男孩」語意最為正確與正常.

Trending News

so do i

5 Answers