promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted

POLL What is the Convincing Evidence AGAINST AMANDA KNOX?

her blood was found in the hallway along with Rapheal's

a staged break in

?????

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 6 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I find it interesting ....that in a country that with at least 10 CSI-type shows......where they can convict murderers with half an eaten cheese sandwich and one strand of hair...........

    they still couldn't convict Casey Anthony with two TRUCK LOADS of evidence.........

    yet, now everyone is a CSI expert in the Amanda Knox trial.

    For your information..........sometimes cases do have OTHER incriminating evidence.......like framing innocent men,, and false statements to the police........which they tend to take pretty seriously in Italy.

    Add to that , her boyfriend did NOT back up HER alibi on court...and they BOTH changed their stories at least 5 times......as each successive lie was proven to be a LIE.

    When told there was Meredith's blood on the knife........Rafaele made up a complete LIE about cooking with Meredith, and accidently stabbing her. It was not a simple lie....as he went on, and added details, about checking to see if she was okay.......and apologizing to her.......and again later apologizing to her..............because he felt really bad about it.

    Uh Huh.............except for one small fact.......................he NEVER cooked anything with Meredith and that NEVER happened.

    Yet when questioned..............made up a pretty elaborate LIE about how her blood got on the knife.

    Doesn't ***MATTER**** if *ANY* blood on the knife was found or not or whose it was.

    When questioned........he totally made up a complete pile of BS to "explain" it.

    Amanda framed an innocent man for MURDER.....the very thing she's *claiming* people are doing to her. Oh, but she had no compunction whatsoever about doing it to someone ELSE...........but god forbid you question HER LIES.

    Sorry, the police here aren't as stupid as the ones in Florida, I guess. They know a damn LIAR when they see one and PROVE their numerous LIES wrong.

    Americans, (which I am one)........seem to be under some bizarre notion that she was ever declared "Innocent".

    That NEVER occured.

    What happned was...........her original conviction was APPEALED................by Italian law, it's AUTOMATIC.

    In that appeal, it was decided that there was *enough* reason, to hold the trial again,...and some questions were not fully explored or answered in the first trial.

    She was therefore RELEASED from Prison, pending the NEW TRIAL.....since, the new trial was ordered, and you don't keep people in jail before a verdict is reached.

    She served no amount of unfair time in jail, since she *WAS* convicted of framing the bar owner, and got a seperate 4 years for that alone. And THAT charge WAS upheld at her first appeal. There was also a slander charge after that..........which is why her sentence was increased this time.

    There has been no "double jeopardy"..........because it's the SAME trial.........just going thru the endless appeals process.

    Think of it, as a murderer on Death row for 20 years........exhausting all their appeals.

    Except, in this case......political pressure of having the poor baby in some nasty Italian jail was applied.......and they came up with a ruling that effectively granted her freedom.........while saying the appeals process must continue. It was a window of opportunity for her to FLEE.........and FLEE she did. She ran back to the United States and wrote books about her "innocence"

    But right after she fled............the same court system reviewed the RULING that let her out of jail, pending the new trial, and found it be without any legal merit whatsoever.

    In other words............a back door political deal was made.......they let her go..........and then quickly reversed the decision that let her go.

    That brings us to the new trial.....and re-examination of the facts, and not surprisingly, she was found as guilty as the first time.

    She has the SAME AUTOMATIC RIGHT.....to appeal *THIS* decision now to Italy's highest court.....and if found guilty THERE..........then that's the end of the line.

    Then , extradiction requests should be made and kept.

    anyone remotely familiar with the facts of the case.......knows they are guilty and lied their azzes off.

    Her act fools no one.......except people who read the "Injustice in Perugia" website........which is like getting your facts about 9-11 off some Truther website.

    She's been solidly found guilty TWICE now.......using the same evidence.

    Her stories and alibi's and whining, didn't add up to a pile of spit.

    Source(s): Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!! I don't **want** to go to prision, is NOT a sound legal defense. Sorry.
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 6 years ago

    There isn't any. All the so-called evidence was fantasies of a corrupt prosecutor and an irresponsible tabloid press.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    6 years ago

    nobody in this section cares

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.