Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
can virtually all species be considered a keystone species?
someone asked me if every species can be considered a keystone species (a species that has a disproportionate effect on the environment relative to its abundance) due to community patterns changing as a result of removal. i'm not sure if every species can be considered a keystone species, but i'm sure lots can.
ex: elephants graze on acacia in the savannah, preventing the savannah from becoming a forest. this allows predators (lions, cheetahs, etc) to see prey and attach. it also allows smaller rodents such as ground squirrels and shrews to find shelter beneath the warm, dry soils of the savannah. so, clearly elephants are a keystone species. but would the removal of, say, lions also have a disproportionate affect on wildebeasts and deer? surely the populations of wildebeasts and deer would rise drastically with the removal of a dominant predator.
TL/DR: would the removal of any species in a community create large enough effects that allow that species to be considered a keystone species?
thank you in advance.
- CLv 57 years agoFavorite Answer
Not all species are keystone species You describe it by definition in your first paragraph
Climate change could effect habits creating a new keystone species.
- ?Lv 77 years ago
No. Removal of lions would allow other predators to expand their populations. They are not a keystone species. BTW, I believe that the savannah is kept from becoming forest by the low rainfall, not by browsing by elephants, giraffes, and other herbivores. Also, there are no deer in Africa; that niche is filled by antelope, mostly.