What agendas could scientist's possibly have?

I don't understand that argument from religious people.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    it is Philosophical and ideological in Nature, They interpret eviodence through a bias prespposition,

    Read this

    Why Are So Many Scientists Atheists?

    http://www.blogos.org/compellingtruth/scientists-a...

    Many scientists deny God's existence because of a commitment to materialism. Francis Crick, a molecular biologist, biophysicist, and neuroscientist, was a materialist to the core. Materialism teaches that there is nothing in the cosmos besides matter and energy. The supernatural does not exist, and there is no such thing as thought, consciousness, or the soul. Crick even went so far as to predict that science would one day find that the act of prayer changes a neurotransmitter in the brain and induces a positive effect on the person praying.

    Some scientists reject faith because of personal experiences. Marie Curie, the only scientist to win two Nobel Prizes in two different science categories, became an atheist or agnostic after the deaths of her mother and sister. It's possible that this loss influenced her theological beliefs. Alan Turing, a mathematician and groundbreaking computer scientist, lost faith in God after the death of his first love. Refusing to believe a loving God would allow her death, Turing embraced materialism.

    Some scientists simply see no use for God. Paul Dirac was a forefather of quantum mechanics. He believed science was well on its way to describing the universe in detail, and he saw religion as a political tool. String-theorist Brian Greene says, "Most scientists like to operate in the context of economy. If you don't need an explanatory principle, don't invoke it."

    Some atheistic scientists come from a religious background and purposefully reject it. Richard Leakey, a paleontologist and conservationist from Kenya, is the grandson of missionaries but was disillusioned with any kind of faith in God.

    Some scientists see faith and science as mutually exclusive. James Watson, who with Francis Crick discovered the double-helix structure of DNA, thought belief in God would preclude his love of science. He loved science more than God.

    There are scientists who simply don't bother thinking about God. Steven Weinberg, a Nobel Prize laureate for his work in particle physics, said, "The experience of being a scientist makes religion seem fairly irrelevant. Most scientists I know simply don't think about it very much. They don't think about religion enough to qualify as practicing atheists."

    Some scientists are religious but deny any reality beyond tradition and ritual. Oliver Sacks, the neurologist portrayed by Robin Williams in the movie Awakenings, loves religion and feels comfortable in both Orthodox Jewish and Catholic settings. He explains that "nature itself seems so wonderful that I don't feel a hunger for any concept beyond it."

    In short, scientists reject faith in God for the same reasons anyone else does. Their atheism is built on some foundational choices:

    1) They choose to worship "created things rather than the Creator" (Romans 1:25 NIV).

    2) They choose to embrace "opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge" (1 Timothy 6:20 NIV).

    3) They choose to retain their sin instead of repenting (John 3:19).

    4) They choose to limit their definition of truth to what can be empirically discovered. Unfortunately, the truth of God cannot be discovered via the scientific method. "The world through its wisdom did not know him" (1 Corinthians 1:21 NIV).

    5) They choose pride over humility (James 4:6).

    One other reason for their rejection of God has to do with the enemy of their souls. "The god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers" (2 Corinthians 4:4). We must never forget that we are involved in a spiritual battle. The human intellect, no matter how lofty, must be redeemed by Christ.

    God gives grace to the humble. "For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards … But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise" (1 Corinthians 1:26-27).

    Of course, not all scientists reject God. Dr. Francis S. Collins is the former head of the National Human Genome Research Institute. As a young man, Collins was well on his way to atheism when a woman dying of heart disease confronted him about his beliefs. He realized that none of his scientific work answered the bigger questions in life. Later, a minister gave him C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity. Something about the irrefutability of natural moral law resonated with him, and he became a Christian. The moment Dr. Collins was saved, there was "rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God" (Luke 15:10 NIV).

    Read more: http://www.compellingtruth.org/scientists-believe-...

    Source(s): TR
  • 7 years ago

    Scientists do have agendas to the same extent as any random person you'd pass on the street. They try to minimize it, and be objective as possible while working, but they're normal people, with all of the biases, drives, interests, and beliefs that go along with being human. The thing is that they don't all have the *same* agenda. The scientific community is set up so that there's a lot of competition, and when a new idea is presented, everyone does their best to disprove that idea.

    That's why the idea of some sort of atheist agenda or anti-creation agenda is so laughable. Not only is there a very wide range of beliefs among scientists, but in a sense they're all working against each other. There's no way that one single agenda could be agreed upon by tens of thousands of scientists and upheld over decades, or in some cases, centuries. It's up there with the moon-hoax conspiracies, and the belief that thousands upon thousands of government employees, and officials from our then-rivals in the USSR, could all orchestrate a flawless hoax and keep quiet about it for more than four decades. It's too big a system, and too adversarial for one single bias or agenda to dominate.

  • 7 years ago

    Because most close-minded people assume that everyone must think and act just like they do.

    So if they think they have an ulterior motive for behaving a certain way, they assume everyone else must also have an ulterior motive for the way they behave.

    Not all religious people are close minded. In fact, some so-called scientists can be just as resistant to new ideas and conclusions.

  • 1. bleach hair white

    2. acquire weird accent

    3. make sandwich

    4. sacrifice virgins to Satan

    5. split atom

    6. get shot by teens playing Goldeneye 64

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 7 years ago

    When you have an agenda (to promote the belief in your imaginary friend), it is apparently inconceivable that other people do things without a similar reason.

    Source(s): .
  • 7 years ago

    science and religion go hand in hand. anyone who says different is silly haha do your research.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.