If Kate Upton had stretch marks, do you think she would still be attractive?
There's no denying she has a great body, whether you're male or female. Imagine she had the same body she has today, just stretch marks on her hips, boobs, and legs. Do you think she would still be considered sexy?
- NCMCLv 67 years agoFavorite Answer
She probably does have stretch marks, a lot, if not most, women do. She's just great at hiding them, and in magazines there is the magic of photoshop and airbrushing. Regardless, she'd still be beautiful.
Stretch marks don't make a person ugly. If they are built nice, they are, and if they have a beautiful face, they do. I don't think stretch marks, which are largely determined by genetics, and not really something people can control, dictate someone's beauty. There are things that you can do to prevent and reduce the size of them, but a lot of times, those things just don't work.
I don't think stretch marks make someone less attractive, just like I don't think a handsome man, or beautiful girl is made less handsome or beautiful if they have a scar on their face, or something of that nature.
I developed pretty quickly in elementary and middle school, and have marks in the places that you mentioned above, and my husband couldn't care less. He doesn't even notice them, because over time they fade, and he really just doesn't mind. It's not impacted our relationship negatively, and he still thinks I'm beautiful. In the beginning I was worried about him seeing them, but then I realized, they weren't a big deal to him, and now they aren't to me.
- 7 years ago
If she had a third arm, third eye and a third boob, she'd still be one of the hottest things on the planet.
- 7 years ago
- Anonymous7 years ago
I honestly don't think guys care about that stuff....
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- JoALv 57 years ago
hell yeah! her face is hot, she isnt a butterface ya know lol