Well I am not an atheist but I do not agree. Simply because of the question, how do u define evidence? If a person say that he had a dream about running from someone, what evidence is there to support that he had that dream? All evidence do not have to be defined by the 5 physical senses. In fact the spiritual is not defined by the 5 physical senses. Yet this is the evidence that people want to support existance of God. The problem is that experiencing God & the spiritual is an individual & personal experience that is unique to the individual. The way I may experience him may not be the way u may experience him. But the complete human is an amalgamation of both the spiritual & the physical, & while the 5 physical senses relate to the physical aspect of man, we have what is known as a 6th sense which is tuned to the spiritual side. The problem is that this 6th semse is under-developed & under-used in many of us. We depend so much now on our 5 physical senses that the 6th sense is severely suppressed & we believe that it do not exist or that the entities related to that 6th sense do not exist. We want evidence of the spiritual to fit into the limited bounderies of the 5 senses...even tho we well know that these 5 senses cannot even relate to many of the physical things (far less the spiritual) that exist around us & that we have to supplement these senses with artificial man-made enhancements to become aware of the unseen, unheard world that exist around us.
Still atheists & other incomplete & un-informed people demand evidence of the spiritual in forms that we can see, hear, taste, touch or smell. And this from people who live now in a world so far removed from nature that it isnt funny.
And that is why I question how do u define the word "evidence". I guess that the evidence that atheist seek is in a form that a person can see or hear or touch. But trillions of people since the creation of man testifying about the personal experiences they have had with God surely cannot be evidence. Looking outside & seeing the sun, the moon, the animals, the fishes, the birds, humans exactly as they were said to be created is not evidence. But believing in a process that no living person has ever seen even tho it is supposed to be an ongoing & continuous process is classed as evidence & accepted as truth.