Why do cons use science to try and discredit science?
but who exactly found that information out? who told you the earth has gone through warming and cooling?
oh, that's right scientists...
but now those same scientists are lying when they say that these current warming and cooling trends seem to be outside of the normal trends for the earth, based on those very same studies that proved the natural warming and cooling in the first place?
in other words... why do you believe what they say only part of the time? if scientists are such an untrustworthy bunch... then couldn't it all be lies?
but you're not doing studies... you're just bring up old scientific ideas and acting like it proves something..
how many of those are actually climate or geological scientists?
that's the study that also let's the grade school science teacher give their opinion on it, right? lol
I was clearly referring to new studies being done.. but hey... let's look for an excuse to drag this into name calling, right?
speaking of "trying harder"... and "looking like a fool"...
if you think all science is wrong... or most of it... then OK... that's fine... but don't then try and use it to disprove it... just run back to your Bible for your facts...
most of your other theories were disproven quite quickly when other scientists started looking at them (or they were so old that it barely falls under the same situation as modern science, things have changed a lot and the accuracy has increased a lot)