Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 years ago

Did the Boston attack prove that bombs are safer than assault rifles?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    According to NRA logic, everyone would have been safer if every single person brought a bomb with them, right?

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    No, but get used to it, as guns are banned and harder for some of the bad guys to get they will resort to weapons like bombs, there will always be thugs with guns only the honest citizens will be disarmed and neutered. With the terrorist this should be a really hot summer.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Obviously a lack of guns will not stop a determined madman from committing mass murder.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    We should always be concerned when a criminal can get a hold of the tools needed to commit murder. They should be more restricted one and all.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Nope, 90 injured with 2 dead.

    Source(s): LL
  • 8 years ago

    bombs are already illegal. No need to write legislation

  • 8 years ago

    No! It just shows that we need to ban.........trash cans.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    I donno however, Obama was pissed when he heard the attacks rendered no gun victims.

    Source(s): AP
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.