Let G be Sn, the symmetric group of order n, acting as permutations on the set {1,2,...n}. Let H =?

Let G be Sn, the symmetric group of order n, acting as permutations on the set {1,2,...n}. Let H = {sigma element in G | n * sigma = n}.

(i) Prove that H is isomorphic to Sn-1.

(ii) Find a set of elements a1,...,an element in G such that Ha1,...,Han give all the right cosets of H in G.

(iii) Find the coset representation of G by H.

Not sure with proof. Please help!

2 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 5
    7 years ago
    Best Answer

    (i) This is trivial, but writing it down is fiddly. It would look better with bold chracters, but I'll make do with apostrophes. Please read X' as "The symbol X in boldface".

    I'll let Sn-1 act as permutations on the set { 1', 2', ..., (n-1)' } and for each s ∈ H define the function s' : { 1', 2', ..., (n-1)' } as follows:

    s'(k') = s(k).

    You can prove that s' is a bijection (permutation) as follows:

    s'(k') = s'(l') <=> s(k) = s(l) <=> k = l, so s' is injective.

    For every l' ∈ { 1', ..., (n-1)' }, we have l ∈ { 1, ..., n-1 }, and so there is some k ∈ { 1, ..., n-1 } with s(k) = l, and so s'(k') = l'. This means that s' is surjective.

    Now to show that the map s -> s' is an isomorphism: Let s,t ∈ H, then

    (s' o t')(k') = s'(t'(k')) = s(t(k)) = (s o t)(k) = s(k) t(k) = s'(k') t'(k').

    (ii) For k ∈ { 1, ..., n-1 } set ak = (k n), and let an be the neutral permutation in G.

    (iii) The cosets are given by H(ak) = { s ∈ G : s(n) = k }. Note that

    H = H(an) = { s ∈ G : s(n) = n } as you wanted.

  • 3 years ago

    that is an similar element because the non-existent guns of Mass Deception that were no longer recent in Iraq and which not in any respect existed. Iran has no nuclear application or perhaps if or not they did, they have a real to have a nuclear application considering the fact that they're threatened by technique of international locations which have nuclear missiles, such as united statesa.. a similar centrists and moderates who dragged united statesa. into Iraq truthfully opt to tug it into Iran and to take action by technique of reinstating the draft. The Bush administration is hoping that Iran will retaliate hostile to their acts of aggression. Unforunately, many people trust that both events have departed from the middle at the same time as the option is authentic and consequently don't realize that this is the radicals on all aspects who're hostile to warmongering and to the upward thrust of fascism in united statesa.. there is really no probability that a presidential candidate can win next 365 days on an brazenly imperialist overseas coverage, even although the vocal fascist minority nicely-known because the Neo-Conservatives advocates very strongly for any such coverage. The president's approval rankings are contained in the 30s (because of the help of alot of brownshirts). Congress is sitting at about 10%, even if that is contained in the palms of the competition social gathering, as this Congress has did not do what it changed into elected to do (carry abode all American troops from in yet another u . s . a .). in the journey that they attack Iran, they ought to carry again protection stress slavery (which changed into used in the course of the Vietnam occupation) and that could nicely be no longer available to do, as very few adolescents may bypass and extremely few may be eligible (the authorities has spent years coming up a group of non-existant "issues" that enable the drug organizations to have extra shoppers and those addicts are basically ineligible for the protection stress). the basically element battling the warfare on Iran from beginning is basically the inability of cannon fodder and the actual shown truth that enslaving the inhabitants can be a political disaster (afterall, in the course of the 60s, adolescents were chop up 50-50 on even if or not they could bypass to Vietnam in spite of few of their mothers and fathers being sympathetic; now the hippies of the 60s are the mothers and fathers, so as that can make the anti-warfare protests even worse for the authorities).

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.