Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會與文化語言 · 7 years ago

請幫我將這段英文文章翻譯成中文

Where the WTO is clearly more effective than GATT is in its conflict-resolution system. It is not enough simply to get some general agreement on, say, the terms which bananas will be produced and traded; because even if a satisfactory general agreement can be reached at one of the periodic international meetings, individual countries may disobey. Under GATT such acts of disobedience were adjudged by a panel of experts who not only had to be unanimous in their decision, but the offending country also had to agree to be tried. The WTO allows majority decisions, and the consent of countries to being judged is not required. Thus, it is now worthwhile for a country suffering from another’s discrimination against its product, to make a complaint. The WTO heard over 300 cases in the first five years of its existence, roughly as many as GATT had dealt with in its entire existence.

Update:

感恩你的google 可惜不能用翻譯軟體 因為翻譯出來是很不順的

4 Answers

Rating
  • 7 years ago
    Best Answer

    世界貿易組織顯然比 關稅暨貿易總協定更有效的衝突解決系統。這是不夠的,僅僅是為了獲得一些通用的協議,比如說,水果生產和交易的條款,即使一個滿意的協議可以達到的定期國際會議,個別國家可能會友不滿的時候。在 關稅暨貿易總協定這種行為不服從判決的一個小組的專家,不僅有他們的決定是一致的,但有問題的國家也不得不同意進行審判。 允許多數人的決定,並不需要被審判的國家同意。因此,現在是非常值得。世界貿易組織聽到的,大約有多達300個病例,其存在的第一個五年與在其整個小組.他們的處理,顯然是更有效的關稅暨貿易總協定是在衝突解決系統。這是不夠的,僅僅是為了獲得一些通用的協議,才會造成人們的不滿!

    WTO:abbr. 1. World Trade Organization 世界貿易組織

    GATT:abbr. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 關稅暨貿易總協定

    Source(s): 我自己
  • 7 years ago

    Where the WTO is clearly more effective than GATT is in its conflict-resolution system. WTO較諸GATT明顯更有效率之處 在於它解決衝突矛盾的系統機制It is not enough simply to get some general agreement on, say, the terms which bananas will be produced and traded; because even if a satisfactory general agreement can be reached at one of the periodic international meetings, individual countries may disobey. 僅僅在某些議題上(譬如香蕉的產銷)得到共識 仍然是不夠的 因為即使在定期召開的國際會議中所達成的某個皆大歡喜的協議 仍有國家可能不願遵守Under GATT such acts of disobedience were adjudged by a panel of experts who not only had to be unanimous in their decision, but the offending country also had to agree to be tried. 在GATT之架構下 諸如此類的不遵守協議之舉動係由一批專家共同裁決 不僅必須取得全體專家一致通過 而且還須違約當事國同意接受裁判The WTO allows majority decisions, and the consent of countries to being judged is not required.然而WTO只需要多數決即可 並且不需違約當事國之同意接受裁決 Thus, it is now worthwhile for a country suffering from another’s discrimination against its product, to make a complaint. 因此 現在 當有某國苦於他國對其產品有歧見時 無須再為此抱怨了 The WTO heard over 300 cases in the first five years of its existence, roughly as many as GATT had dealt with in its entire existence. WTO僅在成立的頭五年卽已處理超過300件案例 約等同於GATT成立迄今所處理的數量

  • 7 years ago

    世界貿易組織顯然比GATT更有效的衝突解決系統。這是不夠的,僅僅是為了獲得一些通用的協議,比如說,香蕉生產和交易的條款,因為即使一個滿意的協議可以達到的定期國際會議,個別國家可能違反。在GATT這種行為不服從判決的一個小組的專家,不僅有他們的決定是一致的,但有問題的國家也不得不同意進行審判。 WTO允許多數人的決定,並不需要被審判的國家同意。因此,現在是值得的國家,其產品的歧視,使投訴。世界貿易組織超過300個病例,聽到的第一個五年它的存在,大約多達GATT在其整個存在處理。

    Source(s): Googie
  • 7 years ago

    世界貿易組織顯然比GATT更有效的衝突解決系統。這是不夠的,僅僅是為了獲得一些通用的協議,比如說,香蕉生產和交易的條款,因為即使一個滿意的協議可以達到的定期國際會議,個別國家可能違反。在GATT這種行為不服從判決的一個小組的專家,不僅有他們的決定是一致的,但有問題的國家也不得不同意進行審判。 WTO允許多數人的決定,並不需要被審判的國家同意。因此,現在是值得的國家,其產品的歧視,使投訴。世界貿易組織超過300個病例,聽到的第一個五年它的存在,大約多達GATT在其整個存在處理。

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.