請幫我將這段英文文章翻譯成中文

Where the WTO is clearly more effective than GATT is in its conflict-resolution system. It is not enough simply to get some general agreement on, say, the terms which bananas will be produced and traded; because even if a satisfactory general agreement can be reached at one of the periodic international meetings,... show more Where the WTO is clearly more effective than GATT is in its conflict-resolution system. It is not enough simply to get some general agreement on, say, the terms which bananas will be produced and traded; because even if a satisfactory general agreement can be reached at one of the periodic international meetings, individual countries may disobey. Under GATT such acts of disobedience were adjudged by a panel of experts who not only had to be unanimous in their decision, but the offending country also had to agree to be tried. The WTO allows majority decisions, and the consent of countries to being judged is not required. Thus, it is now worthwhile for a country suffering from another’s discrimination against its product, to make a complaint. The WTO heard over 300 cases in the first five years of its existence, roughly as many as GATT had dealt with in its entire existence.
Update: 感恩你的google 可惜不能用翻譯軟體 因為翻譯出來是很不順的
4 answers 4