Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 7 years ago

Re. leaked Dept of Agriculture email - Is Obama trying to make the sequester cuts to hurt as much as possible?

..... in hopes that the voters will trash the GOP in "14!" And..... to cause as much harm now so that he (Obama) can "save the country" later via a ruling Dem Congress!

"A leaked email from an Agriculture Department field officer adds fuel to claims President Obama's political strategy is to make the billions in recent federal budget cuts as painful as possible to win the public opinion battle against Republicans.

The email, circulated around Capitol Hill, was sent Monday by Charles Brown, a director at the agency’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service office in Raleigh, N.C. He appears to tell his regional team about a response to his recent question on the amount of latitude he has in making cuts.

According to the email, the response came from the Agriculture Department’s budget office and in part states: “However you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be.”

The response noted that the administration had already told Congress that the APHIS would “eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry” without additional funds.

Arkansas Republican Rep. Tim Griffin said the administration’s response to Brown’s email shows a bid to undermine efforts to replace the cuts, known as sequester, with less onerous ones.

“This email confirms what many Americans have suspected: The Obama administration is doing everything they can to make sure their worst predictions come true and to maximize the pain of the sequester cuts for political gain,” Griffin said in a statement.

Griffin told Fox News on Wednesday that the bosses effectively said “you can’t do anything that is inconsistent with the negative impact that we’ve told everybody these cuts are going to have.”

Under the 2011 deal reached by Obama and Congress, the cuts are supposed to be across the board, meaning government officials have limited flexibility in moving around money.

The administration in recent weeks has made doomsday predictions about the impact of the cuts. And the White House so far has appeared unwilling to accept a Republican offer to give the president more autonomy in making the cuts, covering $85 billion this fiscal year, to help reduce the impact on some of the most essential or hardest-hit programs or agencies.

Some political strategists say the president hopes the cuts hurt enough to compel Republican lawmakers seeking re-election next year to end them by agreeing to more tax increases.

On Sunday, Gene Sperling, the White House’s top economic adviser, suggested Republicans would indeed make this decision."

FOX News 3/6/13 - I know how you libs "hate" FOX, but if this can be proven - it won't make any difference - Obama will be in deep Doo-Doo!

3 Answers

  • Favorite Answer


    That's what all Democrats always do.

    In spite of EVERY Department having MORE money than it had last year, Democrats are expressly ordering cuts to SERVICES but not to things like their dog-grooming budgets.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 7 years ago

    If Obama, was truly trying to do that... America would be feeling the effects now... Rather than mid, to late May... Possibly before...

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    7 years ago


    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.