is it strange after 20 federal filings and appeals, the superior court in dc? ( Viewed 536 times )?

Discuss D. hickman's answer to: 01/16/2013 Order Sua Sponte to/for: Entered 2 day's before initial scheduling conference 01/16/2013

Docket DateDescriptionMessages 01/17/2013 Miscellaneous Docket Copy of Motion to Reopen Case Filed was Mailed to Defendant's.rp 01/17/2013 Motion Filed: Motion to Reopen Case Filed

Attorney: PRO SE (7990 ca 2012)._________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________-

Date Filed » Case » Opinion> »OpinionsDate Filed » Case » Opinion> »02/14/2011 Civil Action No. 2011-0376HICKMAN v. INTEL> et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge Colleen> Kollar-Kotelly02/14/2011 Civil Action No.> 2011-0375HICKMAN v. PACER FEDERAL COURT SERVICES Doc> No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge Colleen> Kollar-Kotelly06/15/2010 Civil Action No.> 2010-1005HICKMAN v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT> et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge John D.> Bates06/15/2010 Civil Action No. 2010-1006HICKMAN v.> BANK OF AMERICA et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) > by Judge John D. Bates06/04/2010 Civil Action No.> 2010-0922HICKMAN v. ALDERSON COURT TRANSCRIPTS SERVICE FOR> THE SUPREME COURT et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion)

by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle05/14/2010 Civil> Action No. 2010-0791HICKMAN v. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF> GOVERNORS et al Doc No. 3> (memorandumopinion) by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle05/04/2010 > Civil Action No. 2010-0687HICKMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF> DEFENSE et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge> Reggie B. Walton04/21/2010 Civil Action No.> 2010-0623HICKMAN v. KENNEDY et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion) by Judge Reggie B. Walton03/02/2010 Civil> Action No. 2010-0331HICKMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF> INVESTIGATION et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by> Judge Henry H. Kennedy01/06/2010 Civil Action No.> 2010-0012HICKMAN v. ARCHIVES et al Doc No. 3> (memorandum opinion) by Judge Emmet G.> Sullivan12/23/2009 Civil Action No. 2009-2410HICKMAN v.> FREEDOM LIBERTY INDEPENDENCE PARTY et al Doc No. 3> (memorandum opinion) by Judge Emmet G.> Sullivan12/23/2009 Civil Action No. 2009-2409HICKMAN

v.> NASA et al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge> Emmet G. Sullivan11/27/2009 Civil Action No.> 2009-2251HICKMAN v. UNITED STATES MINT et> al Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge Ricardo M.> Urbina08/26/2009 Civil Action No. 2009-1616HICKMAN v.> FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion) by Judge Reggie B. Walton07/23/2009 Civil> Action No. 2009-1362HICKMAN v. COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD > Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by Judge Richard W.> Roberts06/10/2009 Civil Action No. 2009-1071HICKMAN v.> FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion) by Judge Richard J. Leon05/26/2009 Civil> Action No. 2009-0974HICKMAN v. THE PENTAGON OF THE UNITED> STATES OF AMERICA Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) by> Judge Rosemary M. Collyer05/04/2009 Civil Action No.> 2009-0816HICKMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Doc No. 3> (memorandum and opinion) by Judge John D.>

Bates02/24/2009 Civil Action No. 2009-0359HICKMAN v.> WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion) by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle02/20/2009 Civil> ActionNo. 2009-0342HICKMAN v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED> STATES OF AMERICA Doc No. 3 (memorandum and opinion) > by Judge Ellen

D. HICKMAN (PLAINTIFF);

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Really ...

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.