How can people still deny global warming?

97% of all climatologists agree that it is real. 99.7% of all recent peer reviewed articles on the subject agree that it is true. There is a mass scientific consensus in this area. No credible institution has claimed it to be false(However some have taken non-committal stances). There seems to be no credible voices... show more 97% of all climatologists agree that it is real. 99.7% of all recent peer reviewed articles on the subject agree that it is true. There is a mass scientific consensus in this area. No credible institution has claimed it to be false(However some have taken non-committal stances). There seems to be no credible voices to support the opposition. The only people that seem to say it is false are cranks, special interest and puppets of the special interest. Do people really believe there is a liberal science conspiracy? Seriously how can people at least not consider it at least very likely?
Update: Vulken do you have any proof of this? What is to be gained by falsifying evidence?And don't you think more climatologist would have integrity than 3%? Also 3% don't deny it either most of the 3% are not sure.
Update 2: http://news.mongabay.com/2009/0122-climate.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n06BWMOh8M&feature=share&list=UU1yBKRuGpC1tSM73A0ZjYjQ
Update 3: Actually the consensus is about 99.83% on peer reviewed articles. Averaging about 1 new study denying it a year, compared to thousands confirming it be true.
Update 4: TheSicilianSage More details and a source please. Also how this disproves climate change.
Update 5: John Purdue, so your saying because you think the idea is laughable its not true, when there is a mass scientific consensus. So we don't have the power to destroy the planet? What if we unleashed all our Nuclear warheads; no power to destroy the planet? Jesus, at least give me a bullshit crank science claim to... show more John Purdue, so your saying because you think the idea is laughable its not true, when there is a mass scientific consensus. So we don't have the power to destroy the planet? What if we unleashed all our Nuclear warheads; no power to destroy the planet? Jesus, at least give me a bullshit crank science claim to debunk.
Update 6: Ed Smurf there are plenty of people saying that the earth is getting cooler and we're heading towards an ice age.
Update 7: TheSicilianSage I watched that documentary you linked and it has a few problems, actually more than a few. Carl Wunsch was tricked into appearing in the film and misquoted to support there view here is a quote from him "I believe that climate change is real, a major threat, and almost surely has a major... show more TheSicilianSage I watched that documentary you linked and it has a few problems, actually more than a few.
Carl Wunsch was tricked into appearing in the film and misquoted to support there view here is a quote from him "I believe that climate change is real, a major threat, and almost surely has a major human-induced component." - http://ocean.mit.edu/~cwunsch/papersonline/responseto_channel4.htm
Patrick Michaels is paid off by oil companies - http://www.youtube.com/watchfeature=player_embedded&v=fguJod_voPc
Scientific Institutions are usually 501(c)3 organizations, so there is not a strong profit motive. And even with scientist not wanting to lose there jobs, there still is oversight be senior members. Are you actually suggesting that only 3% of climatologist have integrity. They are politicizing science just as much as supporters of the belief are, and are trying to argue that climate change believers are Anti-Human.
Not to mention other fallacies(The following are debunke
9 answers 9