Cops claimed they took my license because I "refused" a blood test? But I did pass a breathalyzer?
Questions: 1) How can they say they took my license because I "refused a blood test" when they never even offered me a blood test? Also I did take a breathalyzer test and I passed that, so how could they take my license? I'm just trying to figure out if I should even have to pay the $125 fee and have a hearing when they didn't even legally have a reason to take my license.
2) They are saying I have to go to court due to "driving while impaired (by my prescriptions)," but they never did any physical test that could actually prove I was impaired (i.e. no blood test). It seems they were only going based on how I looked/acted, which I explained is just the way my personality is. Even my doctor knows this. Can they legally charge me and make me have to go to court only based on observed behavior without having any physical evidence, or will the case likely be dropped?