How is the case United States v Miller (1939) used as both pro gun control and against?
- Joe DangeloLv 47 years agoFavorite Answer
Gun rights activists say that it says that ownership of weapons for" efficiency or preservation of a well-regulated militia unit of the present day is specifically protected".
Anti-Gun rights activists say that it explicitly says that the state has the right to disallow citizens to possess certain types of firearms; such as (in the actual case) sawed off shotguns.
- Anonymous7 years ago
Supreme Court Decision:
"In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a 'shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length' at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument."
- aymarLv 43 years ago
Do you extremely think of they are able to administration weapons Hell they are able to't even administration the cost variety.Or any difficulty else. If by some possibility they might take each gun that individuals very own, Do you think of that's the respond? IF that have been to ensue the only people who might have weapons are the very people who do no longer might desire to have them in the 1st place.i think of each you're able to be waiting to strap on a six shooter and have it at their section. you may think of two times approximately robbing that shop or mugging that little previous woman in case you concept anybody around you had a gun and ought to in basic terms blow you away. we desperately might desire to weed out lots of thugs besides. WOW WHAT an concept.
- Adam SLv 77 years ago
The case of US v Miller is used to do your own homework.