Hypocrites than true villain, pathetic! Shameful! Sad! Damn!
- 羅莉Lv 78 years agoFavorite Answer
Compared to straight villains, those disguised hypocrites are rather more
pitiable, shameful, lamentable, and condamnable!
2012-11-27 10:27:04 補充：
原句是簡單的「人vs人」直接比較句, K大師改以事物的條件句來間接表達, 用字嚴謹, 句子本身固然是佳句, 惟邏輯上感覺有一點弱; 為奸為惡, 人皆憎之, 將奸比惡, 而惡竟可行? 似乎欠缺一點說服力, 且原句並無這種含意.
2012-12-04 09:38:14 補充：
不過有人說hypocrites前面不能加disguised(經偽裝的;戴假面具的), 這意見就失之偏頗了, 他還據此認為003遠不如002. 事實上, 英語人士文章有很多disguised hypocrites的寫法(網搜便知), 而拙答中這樣寫更是由於與straight villains的修辭搭配必要, 並無不妥.
2012-12-04 09:38:34 補充：
反觀002寫的"self-proclaimed hypocrites"我覺得才是用詞不當, 試問除了意見018故意自稱小人以支持他的讚賞以外, 生活中哪有人會自我宣稱是小人的? 小人是在言行上很容易觀察而知的, 所以用straight較為適當.
2012-12-04 14:15:45 補充：
Give it up and behave yourself, prisoner kid. You're simply too small to give
Nobody would regard you a mute if you keep your mouth shut.
2012-12-04 14:52:41 補充：
我沒有投票部隊, 所有投我票的大大們都有名有姓, 沒有一位是受我指揮的, Prisoner妳說他們是我的投票部隊是在侮辱他們. 妳所指控的兩位, Infinito與Cavalier, 是我們的麻將團隊成員, 我們三位外號鐵三角, 刻意使用相似編輯風格, 突顯團隊CIS識別. 他們都是知識長等級, 這意味著他們已對YK+貢獻良多助人無數, 他們的英文實力都比我強, 回答品質有目共睹, 等級不是混出來的. 他們很少投我的票, 但偶而也會捧場鼓勵, 這怎叫作投票部隊?
2012-12-04 14:55:16 補充：
Prisoner妳自以為是血口亂噴, 我一向刻意忍讓不跟妳一般見識, 但現在不得不發言澄清以正視聽. 妳指稱他們是我的multiple ID, 要不要哪天跟我們三個見個面, 打一桌麻將呢?
2012-12-05 11:54:19 補充：
There exist on this forum a lot of answerers who you should accuse of using voting troops, but I AM DEFINITELY NOT ONE OF THEM.
Don't spoil my name wrongfully, Prisoner, or you may have to keep staying in prison permanently.
By the way, Lorita is not my name.
2012-12-05 17:42:12 補充：
大熊貓, 請您弄清楚, 我沒有跟誰吵架, 我只是對不實的指控作必要的澄清. 您那些高調我都贊同, 但唱高調容易, 若有人用不實指控來冤枉您, 破壞您的名譽, 您也不可能唾面自乾, 因為您不是聖人. 我哪來的投票部隊? 我是主持一個麻將知識團沒錯(現YK+已關閉), 但這數十個團員從來沒有投票給我的英文區回答, 我也從來沒有發函給他們, 這與投票部隊毫不相干.
2012-12-05 17:42:30 補充：
我常常吃他人投票部隊的虧, 常在投票最後一天截止前20分鐘內由16:0領先變成16:24被硬搶最解. 如果我有投票部隊, 就可以即時反制, 也就不會吃這麼多悶虧了. 我痛恨投票部隊, 所以不屑於玩投票部隊. Prisoner搞不清楚何謂灌票而對我胡亂攻擊, 我豈能乖乖受辱? 發函邀票(邀請評鑑)是YK+允許的行為, 因主動權在他不在我. 一人多帳戶自己投自己才是灌票, YK+的積極參與者誰沒有一個以上的帳戶? 但合法使用積極參與問答YK+是允許多帳戶的, 但開幾十個帳戶專門用來投票、評價、贊點惡搞而沒有或罕於參與問答, 就是YK+取締的目標了.
2012-12-05 17:58:28 補充：
我在英文區的回答, 篇篇嚴謹認真, 我得到的最佳解答不少, 我自信全都當之無愧, 若有人想在其中找出一篇真正遜於落選解答的, 都恐怕很難. 我幹嘛需要去搞什麼投票部隊? 要發函邀票也應確實是品質優於他人解答才行, 否則別人幹嘛要幫你抬轎? 我俯仰無愧, 敢面對任何人的舉證質疑, 我的等級絕不是混來的或作弊而得的. 但有人就是硬要口無遮攔亂罵, 嘴巴長在她身上, 我又奈何? 有人建議我找網路警察主持公道嗎?Source(s): 羅莉 - 翻譯經驗
- ThurstonLv 68 years ago
cat coles, hypocrite, is here again. The following is my personal opinion.
I don't get it why most people voted for 003.
002's answer is much better than it, for "hypocrite" includes the meaning of "disguised." There is no need to add it before hypocrite.
2012-12-02 19:24:09 補充：
I hope this is a fair voting competition.
don't vote for a specific person only because he/she send e-mail to claim there is someone cheating as well, so please vote for him to be against that claimed-cheater. something like that.
2012-12-03 19:30:07 補充：
I personally believe 002 has a generous mind not to care about this trifling cheating stuff. ;) (cat coles slips away...)
2012-12-03 22:24:27 補充：
She will be respected if she makes good use of it to be against those who have voting friends as well. But not here.
2012-12-06 02:06:59 補充：
need a hug?
- jeffreylin0903Lv 78 years ago
I swear Master K always uses BIG words....
I bet he is a real life poet!!!
2012-12-05 16:00:08 補充：
This is a knowledge forum, not a fighting forum, so let these pointless arguments stop already....
I swear you two always argue about the same thing over and over again, and it's getting pretty tiring already.
2012-12-05 16:00:21 補充：
I think we should grow out of this immaturity and do our utmost to help those in need, not arguing about some lame stuff like this....
2012-12-05 19:11:33 補充：
Oops.....當我沒說...think I accidentally opened a can of worms =_=
2012-12-06 07:00:58 補充：
Only if you are wearing bikinis! (Wink)
- KevinLv 78 years ago
If overt nastiness is pitiable, dishonorable, lamentable and abominable, hypocrisy only makes it acceptable.
I come, I opt, I paste, I yield - yet I am no cat.
2012-11-27 08:59:39 補充：
Big words? Where? I don't see any of them. ^_^
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 天堂鳥Lv 78 years ago
I guess our dear Master Jim Jim hasn't put in mind for those negative comments.
See, his hahaha is still so open- minded! ^^
- 8 years ago
2012-11-27 14:25:34 補充：
NICE 2 meet U!!^^
- prisoner26535Lv 78 years ago
In comparison to self-proclaimed villains, hypocrites are much more pitiful, shameful, despicable, and detestable.
2012-11-26 09:09:03 補充：
Why does Jim dude see this question political?罵我爛透了? Hehehe, I am used to it...
2012-11-26 15:20:45 補充：
Hahaha, I thought I saw a copy cat here. No wonder they said - to imitate is the highest compliment. Thanks but no thanks.
2012-12-02 23:07:25 補充：
Mr Cole - your complaint is what I have been fighting for. Many on this board vote for their friends but not for the merits of the answer.
I have debates with Lorita (and her split personalities, Inifinito, Cavalier and whatever she will come up with) many times.
2012-12-02 23:10:33 補充：
And she remains unconvinced that her practices be harmful to this board and the others who do their best to come up with good answers.
She even provided a way to reach the level you want - just gang up with 51 of your friends and vote for one another - all 51 of you will become masters in a month
2012-12-02 23:15:01 補充：
However, she deserves credit on some of her answers with detail info even though her English capability is still at "having higher test score" level but not "literature appreciation level". This post is one example.
2012-12-02 23:20:21 補充：
But anyway, she will get her way on this one as well by invoking her voting troops but I just keep wondering why she wants to win the battles but losing the reputation of a fine scholar? Mind boggling indeed. Probably she needs to mature more.
2012-12-02 23:23:59 補充：
One comment on those who vote for friends but not the merits of the answers - don't sell your consciences.
2012-12-04 05:46:04 補充：
let's find out who 002 is when it ends - she must be a saint.
2012-12-04 10:34:54 補充：
Give it up, Lorita. On English board, you are the only one at Master level who has
1. multiple ID
2. voting troops
No one else feels the needs to use them, why?
Why do you need to use them regardless how you may justify?
Give it up - you should value your reputation better.
2012-12-04 10:42:36 補充：
Be role model to these young guys.
I thought we all are charged to create a board for free info exchange, not for you to become a master or knowledge in chief.
Does this mean anything to you? Think big and beyond yourself...
2012-12-04 10:50:52 補充：
Who is right and who is right is a single post is of no importance to me.
What is is to show the right process on how to argue and how to debate so that more and more masters can come to the board to contribute.
Think big, dude, and more importantly, beyond yourself.
2012-12-04 21:30:06 補充：
Sure - your voting gang was the reason why 「知識團」services are terminated.
Lorita, stop using your voting troops and give YK+ a clean space.
- 河小豚Lv 78 years ago
偽君子比真小人可憐!Hypocrites than the villainous poor!偽君子比真小人可恥!Hypocrites than the villainous shameful!偽君子比真小人可悲!Hypocrites than the villainous sad!偽君子比真小人可惡!Hypocrites than the villainous abominable! 可憐!Poor!可恥!Shameful!可悲!Sad!可惡!Abominable!
- Jim-歸鄉樂Lv 78 years ago
- DaSaGwaLv 78 years ago
Hypocrites is more pathetic, more shameful, more lamentable, and more abominable than true villain.
2012-11-26 10:46:06 補充：
Master Jim! You shall NOT feel anything from those negative comments. Treat them as buzzing flies. Nowadays, no matter whether you get it right, you get criticized one way or the other. Keep up with your excellent work!