Anonymous
Anonymous asked in TravelAsia PacificJapan · 7 years ago

Seriously, How can Japan deny Nanjing Massacre and say it is just China's imagination...?

First, i must say that i'm not even Chinese but i think it just doesn't make any sense.

it is like Germany is saying there wasn't Nazi's.

*at least* Germany admits and acknowledges its past crimes so that's why neighboring countries are having no problems with Germany, but Japan is still hated by all of its neighbors. think about why.

most of their politicians including Ishihara is still saying like that and this year a mayor of Nagoya said it again.

***please think about the victims...it is NOT a small number, many Chinese lost their whole family only because of Japan, the number of victims was over 20million(at least). if you're going to say something like 'China killed its own people', then it doesn't make sense, Japan is another country when Chinese can forgive China's fault more generously.

that's why Japan is going through a nuclear disaster, which is said to be already worse than Chernobyl.

www.enenews.com

Why can't Japan just accept the fact that it was committed by Japan??? Japan should realize that now Japan has become not that powerful compared to a few decades ago, both China and Korea got powerful in every field too.

Update:

EDIT : I mean, casualties in China done by Japan during WW2 were over20 million, not because of simple Nanjing thing, you dumbass.

Update 2:

EDIT 2 : and Japan 'doesn't' deny Nanjing Massacre??? how about this link??? Nagoya mayor denies Nanjing Massacre.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/world/asia/chine...

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Best Answer

    The 'Nanking Massacre' in which the Prosecution claims the 'massacre of 300,000', has never been so proved. However, any other unjustifiable killings by Japanese troops are regarded as punishable war crimes during the battles against the Chinese Army, and these should be processed under the international humanitarian law.

    Before the battle of Nanking, the commander General Iwane Matsui ordered the Japanese army to be very careful not to kill any civilians. During the battle, every civilian took refuge in the Nanking Safety Zone. Japanese army did not attack it, and there were no civilian victims, except for several who were accidentally killed or injured by stray shells. According to the Documents of the Nanking Safety Zone, the committee members in China reported to the world about the number of victims in Nanking battle was 49 people in 1938.

    John Rabe, later handed a letter of thanks for this to the commander of the Japanese army.

    December 14, 1937 Dear commander of the Japanese army in Nanking, We appreciate that the artillerymen of your army did not attack the Safety Zone. We hope to contact you to make a plan to protect the general Chinese citizens who are staying in the Safety Zone….We will be pleased to cooperate with you in any way to protect the general citizens in this city.

    --Chairman of the Nanking International Committee, John H. D. Rabe--"

    If the Japanese military wanted to massacre every Nanking citizen, it would have been very easily done if they only bombarded the Nanking Safety Zone. The Japanese military did not attack it, but rather protected all the people of the Zone. In the mind of General Matsui, the purpose of the war was not to take the land, but to save Chinese civilians from the Chinese civil war, killing among the Chinese themselves.

    James Espy, the vice American Council at Nanking, reported to the American Embassy at Hankow concerning the aspect of the city right before the fall of Nanking as follows :

    Monition should be made here, however, that the Chinese themselves are not altogether exonerated of depredations, at least to some extent, before the entry of the Japanese. During the last few days some violations of people and property were undoubtedly committed by them. Chinese soldiers in their mad rush to discard their military uniforms and put on civilian clothes, in a number of incidents, killed civilians to obtain their clothing.

    After the Japanese occupation, did the population of Nanking decrease by more than 200,000?

    Let’s look at many historical records. On Dec 8,1937, Tang Sheng-zhi, who was Chinese commander, warned that all the noncombatants should assemble in the Safety Zone, and the citizens rushed into the Safety Zone for the safety.

    As the result, there were no people within the castle except in the Safety Zone. John Rabe, the Safety Zone Committee (TSZC) member, wrote in his diary in Dec 10, when the Nanking battle began, the Nanking population was 200,000. TSZC described in the Document No.9 dated in Dec 17, "On the 13th when the Japanese entered the city, we had nearly all the civilian population in the Safety Zone, so the number 200,000 is no doubt.

    For TSZC, it was absolutely necessary to know the accurate number of people in order to distribute food to those refugees. After the Japanese victory and occupation took place, TSZC in its document dated on December 17, and in subsequent documents, consistently recognized this number. Afterwards how did the population of Nanking change? TSZC documents read that in January 1938 the population was 250,000.

    Lewis S. C. Smythe, professor of Nanking University investigated the population with the help of many Chinese staffs on February 1938. He wrote a report which shows the population of Nanking was 250,000 or 270,000 as of the end of March 1938. The Nanking City Administrative Office of the Nanking Restoration Government, which was established on March 28, 1938, registered 277,000 inhabitants. Japanese soldiers killed 300,000 Chinese people in Nanking city?

    Why many Chinese people came back to Nanking after Japanese occupied the city?

    Why Mao didn't announce about the massacre in the international mass media conferences from 1937 to 1938?

    Why Chinese government could not prove the murder of 340,000 when The International Military Tribunal for the Far East was opened?

    The British newspaper North China Daily News, which was published in China in English on December 24, 1937, eleven days after the Japanese occupation of Nanking, carried a photo taken in Nanking by their photographer. The photo was entitled "Japanese distribute gifts in Nanking." In the photo are Japanese soldiers distributing gifts, and Chinese adults and children receiving the gifts and rejoicing. Is this the scene of a massacre?

    How can Japanese admit the wrong history such as the Nanking Massacre?

    Hey, Please tell me.

    Source(s): Recent scientific research has revealed that there are no photographs attesting to a massacre in Nanking. At least 143 pictures are distorted, are fabricated, or are used for the Nanking Massacre pictures which were from different areas and different times by Chinese government. Analyzing the “Photographic Evidence” of the Nanking Massacre http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/26_S4.pdf http://tamezou.tripod.com/nanking/alleged/index.ht... Some photographs in the second sino-Japanese war with primary source material http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtysyW5dhM0&feature... Analyzing the “evidence of moving pictures ” of the Nanking Massacre http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LbVeadjSbo Rescue operation of Japanese soldiers http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fRp_QPvok8&feature... Truth of World War II - What Japan fought for http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ti2K5yStfU&feature...
  • Quinn
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    It's call denial and why are you so mystified by it?

    The Japanese deny the Nanjing Massacre. The Chinese deny the Tienanmen Massacre. The Iranians deny the Holocaust. The N. Koreans deny starting the Korean War. The British deny using concentration camps during the Boers War. The list goes on and on. You see the same thing played out in criminal court trials everyday where murderers, thieves, rapists, pedophiles, muggers, etc. all claim their innocence. I've been a juror on a case where the only defense argument presented was that the crime never happened even though suspect was videoed at the crime scene, his fingerprints all over the place, and no less than 3 people identified him. Denial is the last refuge of the guilty.

    The irony is that the only people who has owned up to something along this line is the Germans who accepted responsibility for the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazi.

  • 7 years ago

    Japan doesn't deny the Nanking " massacre ". What they do deny are the exaggerated figures of 300,000 + deaths. There wasn't that many people in the whole city !

    Read " The Alleged Nanking Massacre " for the Japanese viewpoint on this.

    20 million ?

    What does WWII have to do with Fukushima ?

    Source(s): I don't block anyone.
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.