Where should a progressive run for congress?

I'm from the west coast, which state on the west coast would be better for a fairly progressive person

3 Answers

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Please stay away from CT. We're already the most expensive state to live in, thanks to...ahem..."progressives."


    The democrat party has always embraced progressive Republican Teddy Roosevelt’s “New Nationalism.”

    In a speech on August 31, 1910 in Osawatomie, Kansas TR laid out his agenda for a welfare-state, including:

    -A National Health Service

    -Social insurance, to provide for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled

    -Limited injunctions in strikes (unions have always been a privileged class in welfare/socialist states)

    -Federal income tax

    -An inheritance tax

    As to how his agenda would affect our Constitution? He couldn’t have cared less:

    ”This, I know, implies a policy of a far more active governmental interference with social and economic conditions in this country than we have yet had, but I think we have got to face the fact that such an increase in governmental control is now necessary.”

    Democrat President Wilson (1913-1918) said, “You are not here merely to make a living. You are here to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, and with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world. You impoverish yourself if you forget this errand.” He may have been the first democrat to appreciate the potential use of multiculturalism (“If it’s white or American, trash it!”) in deconstructing the Constitution, saying, “No nation is fit to sit in judgment upon any other nation.” Obama put it this way: “Every nation is exceptional in its own way.”

    Democrat President Roosevelt “let it all hang out” in his speech before Congress on January 11, 1944:

    “We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights...” [which included] the right: to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation; of every family to a decent home; to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health; to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment.

    [Of course, democrats rarely credit our semi-capitalist, Constitutional economic system with doing a pretty da%n&* good job of achieving those goals. Until their utopian CHANGE is achieved they’ll never be satisfied]

    -LBJ’s CHANGE, The Great Society, became the largest redistribution of wealth program in history. But Obama will out-CHANGE them all.

    It is only because of the Internet, talk radio and Fox News (all non-existent a generation ago!) that we are learning the truth about the democrat party and how effective it has been in replacing our Constitution with its welfare state model:

    -2/4/10 Gallup poll: 61% of liberals have a positive view of socialism.

    -6/2/11 Gallup poll: 71% of democrats favor re-distributing wealth.

    -9/6-9/2012 http://www.gallup.com/poll/157481/majori%E2%80%A6 Those who believe government should have more control over our lives: Republicans 15%; Independents, 29%; Democrats 67%.

    -Now they have national health care, the foundation of all welfare and socialist states.

    Ben Franklin: "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."

    Thomas Jefferson: "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”

  • 8 years ago

    IOWA NEWSPAPER Mr Romney for President

    LAND O'LAKES, Fla.—Mitt Romney won a major newspaper endorsement on Saturday, as the Des Moines Register's editorial board formally backed the GOP candidate's bid for the presidency.

    It was the first time in 40 years the influential battleground state paper endorsed a Republican in the general election, dating back to its support of Richard Nixon in the 1972 election. The Register previously backed Romney in the 2012 GOP p

    But according to the paper, it determined Romney was better positioned to "forge the compromises in Congress" necessary to turn the economy around, create jobs and get the federal budget back on track.

    "Romney has made rebuilding the economy his No. 1 campaign priority--and rightly so," the Register's editorial read.

    At the same time, the paper noted Obama's "best efforts to resuscitate the stumbling economy have fallen short."

    "Nothing indicates it would change with a second term in the White House," the paper said. "Barack Obama rocketed to the presidency from relative obscurity with a theme of hope and change. A different reality has marked his presidency. His record on the economy the past four years does not suggest he would lead in the direction the

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    It by no ability afflicted me. the alternative is a vast ability grab of all factors of my life. that's worth struggling with for through telephone calls, protest, public knowledge of voter registration fraud (those adult adult males are my heros), struggling with tax payer fraud, waste and abuse. exercising your vote.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.