Obama caught in a lie...did you hear what the Libya questioner said?
Even if he wasn't sure it was terror as the following passage and link show, why did he send his staff on national tv shows to blame a video? This is the greatest fact check yet.
President Obama, though, wasn’t done with Kerry Ladka. “After the debate, the president came over to me and spent about two minutes with me privately,” says the 61-year-old Ladka, who works at Global Telecom Supply in Mineola, N.Y. According to Ladka, Obama gave him ”more information about why he delayed calling the attack a terorist attack.” For background, Obama did apparently lump Benghazi into a reference to “acts of terror” in a Sept. 12 Rose Garden address. However, he spent about two weeks holding off on using the full “terrorist” designation. The rationale for the delay, Obama explained to Ladka, was to make sure that the “intelligence he was acting on was real intelligence and not disinformation,” recalls Ladka.
- Dog FatherLv 57 years agoFavorite Answer
Read the whole rose garden transcript from 9-12-12 come on Obama slicing it pretty thin you know you didn't call it a terrorist attack.. Why is the presidents intelligence so lacking? What nobody has an Iphone in the Benghazi embassy? I mean anyone in a america can call 911 and say officer down and in 2 minutes 100 police are all over it..
Please Obama America is just not that stupid..
- hastingsLv 43 years ago
sure, why do not we attack some extra international locations? isn't 5 in the middle East sufficient for you? Why do not we bomb Mexico? the following is the component. the u . s . a . is doing all of this waring because it really is now the truly growing to be organization it really is growing to be. the u . s . a . change into once in the organization of organization. Now it is in simple terms in the organization of conflict. and headed in direction of the third international conflict. conflict is what makes the better classes pocket books advance at the same time as all some thing else people pay...the question should be why are not extra people screaming quit a majority of those wars//// Obama is way more desirable at what he does than GW change into....spending...and lengthening a majority of those Wars...who will be attacked next?
- Anonymous7 years ago
Democrats will say or do anything to advance their century old agenda.
The democrat party has always embraced Republican Teddy Roosevelt’s “New Nationalism.”
In a speech on August 31, 1910 in Osawatomie, Kansas TR laid out his agenda for a welfare-state, including:
-A National Health Service
-Social insurance, to provide for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled
-Limited injunctions in strikes (unions have always been a privileged class in welfare/socialist states)
-Federal income tax
-An inheritance tax
As to how his agenda would affect our Constitution? He couldn’t have cared less:
”This, I know, implies a policy of a far more active governmental interference with social and economic conditions in this country than we have yet had, but I think we have got to face the fact that such an increase in governmental control is now necessary.”
Democrat President Wilson (1913-1918) said, “You are not here merely to make a living. You are here to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, and with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world. You impoverish yourself if you forget this errand.” He may have been the first democrat to appreciate the potential use of multiculturalism (“If it’s white or American, trash it!”) in deconstructing the Constitution, saying, “No nation is fit to sit in judgment upon any other nation.” Obama put it this way: “Every nation is exceptional in its own way.”
Democrat President Roosevelt “let it all hang out” in his speech before Congress on January 11, 1944:
“We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights...” [which included]:
-The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation
-The right of every family to a decent home
-The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health
-The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment.
LBJ’s Great Society became the largest redistribution of wealth program in our history. Obama is trying to “outperform” LBJ.
It is only because of the Internet, talk radio and Fox News (all non-existent a generation ago!) that we are learning the truth about the democrat party and how effective it has been in replacing our Constitution with its welfare state model:
-2/4/10 Gallup poll: 61% of liberals have a positive view of socialism.
-6/2/11 Gallup poll: 71% of democrats favor re-distributing wealth.
-9/6-9/2012 http://www.gallup.com/poll/157481/majori… Those who believe government should have more control over our lives: Republicans 15%; Independents, 29%; Democrats 67%.
-Now they have national health care, the foundation of all welfare and socialist states.
Ben Franklin: "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
Thomas Jefferson: "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”
- Jim BLv 67 years ago
This is not the only lie he got cought in. But it is the one the people know the most about. If he would lie about one thing why would he be believed about other things. Because he is Obama the great. I think NOT.. He's done
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Jazz ELv 57 years ago
Obama is more honest than that lying piece of crap Romney.
- BushmasterLv 67 years ago
Typical Osamabama lies
- MikeLv 57 years ago
There were many lies out of Obama... Only one caught the moderators attention, thanks to Romney...