"both i'm incorrect and im an uneducated, conceited, self righteous, hypocritical technology iliterate, or ninety 8.5% of all scientists who settle for the theory of evolution by organic selection are incorrect." properly, to be truthful, I easily ought to assert that in case you've faith as you propose, you're incorrect, and the different stuff that is going with it. utilising arguments from a creationist information superhighway website isn't too brilliant. they have an awl to grind and finished brush aside for actuality. Naming creationists is termed "argument from authority." regardless of the indisputable fact that it in basic terms works in the adventure that they were authoritative contained in the field of the argument. Newton became no longer. He turned right into a mathematician. So that is a "fake argument from authority." Quoting from the Bible is brilliant, yet first you should educate that the Bible is a valid reference. Failure to understand technology is strictly why the ignorant, uneducated, superstitions, nomadic shepherds made up thoughts concerning a magic starting place for humanity. Now, i can see that you're providing argument varieties utilized by theists regardless of the indisputable fact that the way you cutting-edge them makes me believe you're also atheist and are purely mocking theists. If i'm incorrect about that, then you definately are really pathetic. yet when i'm properly, you're purely showing the idiocy of theists who make stupid claims. and also you're doing it by summarizing the stupid stuff they need to assert.