I used to believe that means about folks like the girl from 13 reasons Why too, now not see you later in the past, but I discovered that it's exclusive strokes for unique individuals. I might go on about how a seeing a cockroach would power one to suicide and not the other, however that's no longer the factor. For one factor, i have never learn many YA novels, and apart from i do not believe those I dislike are the worst of the style. In truth, i don't really dislike them, it can be simply that I did not experience them. Some no longer a lot, some on no account. Some not as much as most persons do, and that is acquired me questioning...However on the other hand, one-of-a-kind strokes for distinctive men and women. There may be Twilight, but meh. Then there's The hunger games Trilogy. And i know i am gonna get bashed for this, plus get myself thumbed down. But i don't see the complexity within the characters. All I consider is one person, no layer to the one-of-a-kind men and women within the books. No buildup, no go with the flow, it can be like operating on a character without anesthesia. EDIT Kelley, Rowling isn't a young grownup creator. She is (with the exception of informal emptiness, which is adult) a kid's literature creator. People mostly put out of your mind that, and fairly I think that's a praise. Anyway, I ought to agree on what you stated, Rowling would not underestimate age. By means of Dumbledore she stated, "formative years are not able to understand how age thinks and feels. However ancient men are guilty in the event that they put out of your mind what it was to be young..."