Were Clinton and Reagan good presidents?

I asked a question on why a certain president back in the 20s had his lying habits and some 13 year old brat called me a re tard and went off on how Clinton and Reagan were an embarrassment to America. So this comes to mind, Clinton was the only president to balance the budget after the 40s. That's the only thing i know about him other that he was just about impeached for adultery or something. As for Reagan, he rescued the hostages from Iran and had a serious nature from what i heard. Your thoughts?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Both had good aspects. Most others from recent years were very bad. Especially Carter and Obama.

    Study your Constitution and you will see it provides for a system pf Government designed to grant personal Power to Every Responsible Citizen.

    No President is perfect, but any President that engages in shifting Power and Rights from Citizens to themselves or to Government Bureaucracies is an Elitist Tyrant and is in violation of the principles established by our Founding Fathers.

    One of the biggest mistakes America has ever made was to give Government workers the ability to unionize.

    Those Socialist Unions now have the power to extort money from taxpayers and put in into their own pockets while being exempt from accountability for their own lack of providing anything we would be willing to pay them for and they get More money than anyone working Real jobs in the Real world.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • roca
    Lv 4
    3 years ago

    you won't be able to fault Jimmy Carter for attempting. He became/is an surprisingly compassionate guy and additionally an surprisingly clever person. He in simple terms did no longer make an surprisingly sturdy President. in terms of public speaking, you will get the comparable element from Clinton as you do from Carter because of the fact any time somebody criticizes the strategies they made whilst in place of work, they are going to take it in my view. the version is Carter has one element Clinton would not -- humility. you may anticipate Clinton to chew lower back stressful each and every time his administration comes under fire because of the fact he's one very boastful, egotistical person. P.S.: Your first responder desires to get his head out of his @$$ and end spewing liberal propaganda. President Clinton in actuality sat lower back for 8 years and took credit for each and all the artwork performed by one Ronald Wilson Reagan. the present state of the monetary gadget would be laid squarely on the ft of Slick Willie because of the fact he did diddly-over-squat for the monetary gadget and squandered tax money on the form of diverse socialist classes that by no potential observed the sunshine of day (thank God). to those who factor the finger at Bush and the present Iraq conflict, if Clinton hadn't blown off the Sudanese whilst they provided Osama bin encumbered up on a silver platter, possibilities are high the united statesS. Cole disaster and 9/11 might by no potential have occurred...

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Clinton rode the wave of a housing bubble and a tech bubble, he didn't do anything.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    Just Reagan. Anyone with an "R" next to their name is a great President.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 8 years ago

    Clinton, good, Regan,one of the worst. He put thousands of air traffic controllers out of work. He also closed down mental hospitals that put these people on the street.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 8 years ago

    Nope both sucked

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 8 years ago

    No they weren't. The only decent one is Jimmy Carter.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 8 years ago

    no

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.