Do you think multiculturalism is here to stay?

Question

every "western" nation has implemented multiculturalism over the last 50 years .. do you think this is permanent? it seems to me that it is most likely permanent because it would be almost impossible to reverse it at this point. to reverse it would require massive displacement of massive amounts of people...

Answer 1

It has been impossible to reverse every since Europeans decided to conqueror the world over 500 years ago.

Answer 2

It's practically irreversible (unless there's some kind of hitler government), and yes it's here to stay. But the danger of multiculturalism is groups of people separating themselves from other groups. I.e. segregation. That's what's happening in many countries.

Answer 3

To ban multiculturalism would be like trying to ban guns in this country...impossible.

Answer 4

Multiculturalism means when in Rome, tell the Romans what to do. This idea, like most leftist ideas, is heading for the trash heap of history.

Answer 5

No, eventually the dominant group will dismantle it.
The risk is, that by the time that happens, the dominant group will be one of the non-Western immigrants, and the West will be destroyed.
Multiculturalism destroys our culture and must be ended immediately.

Answer 6

Obviously its here to stay. It has always been here starting with when englanders and Irish and scots bum rushed this side of the world and stole the natives people land. So ya it would be hardto send u all back to England or Ireland or wherever ur ancestors came from.

Answer 7

For Muslims, multiculturalism has been a gift from Allah. It is giving them time to implement their ancient three step strategy of conquest:

Step one: Achieve self-segregation through self-alienation:
-Reject assimilation with an in-your-face attitude: live in Muslim ghettos; wear radically different attire; relentlessly demand special treatment like prayer rooms on the job and in schools, exclusive halal food in schools and eateries, promote banning criticism of Islam, etc; bring lawsuits and riot to attain cultural change, knowing that native extremists will eventually retaliate with violence – then Muslims become the “victim” and Muslim extremists respond with violence. In the meantime...

Step two: Overwhelm the natives with superior reproduction rates:
-1/30/09 Timesonline UK: Muslim population growth between 2004 and 2008 was ten times greater than the rest of society.
-2/09 The Finnish Ministry of Defense published a position paper saying: In 1991 there were 300 mosques in Russia. Today there are 8,000, financed by Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia.
-8/8/09 Daily Telegraph, London: Europe’s Muslim population has more than doubled in the past 30 years and will have doubled again by 2015.
-10/28/10, Daily Mail: Mohamed or derivatives of that name is now the number one name in all of England.
-Apostacy is considered treason by the Muslim community. Penalties can be severe. Muslim populations only grow -- never diminish.

Step three is civil war, in the defense of Islam:
-Google search “civil wars in the world” then research each individual civil war and you will find one common combatant in 90% of them: Muslim extremists. Muslims are involved in civil wars in China, Russia, Bosnia, Cyprus, Macedonia, Israel, Pakistan, India, Indonesia-Ambon & Halmarhera, Côte d’Ivoire, Kashmir, Kosovo, Kurdistan, Kirghizia, Nigeria, Philippines, Somalia, Turkey, Chechnya, Sudan, Yemen, Thailand, Uganda, Azerbaijan and East Timor.
-8/09 Bosnia Muslim leader Mustafa Ceric declared Christian Serbian Muslim-majority territory boarding Montenegro as Muslim homelands. The same Muslims we saved from ethnic cleansing by bombing Christian Serbs in the 90’s are now claiming more Serbian land.
-8/20/10 AsiaNews, Kashmir: Extremist Muslims are demanding Sikhs convert or leave.
-8/23/10 Reuters: Since 2004 Muslim extremists have killed 4,000 Buddhists in southern Thailand, which they are claiming as Muslim homelands.
-10/4/11 AFP news, Philippines: “The government had previously warned that Umbrakato posed a serious threat to efforts aimed at ending a Muslim insurgency that has left an estimated 150,000 people dead over more than four decades.” Muslims want their own independent nation.
-1/3/12 Reuters, China: “[Muslim] Uighurs in Xinjiang rioted against Han Chinese residents in 2009 and at least 197 people were killed, according to official estimates.” Muslims want their own independent nation.
-4/1/12 AP, Hat Yai, Thailand: Bombs in southern Thailand kill 14, injure 340. Suspected Muslim insurgents staged the most deadly coordinated attacks in years in Thailand’s restive south, killing 14 people and injuring 340 with car bombs that targeted Saturday shoppers and a high-rise hotel frequented by foreign tourists.

Basic to Islam's successful conquests is this: Extremists rule Islam, and always have:

-History records that Muslim General Khalid ibn al-Walid’s (592-642AD) responded to a question about why Mohamed’s armies were advancing on Byzantium by saying: “It was thirst that made us leave our homes. We have heard that Byzantine blood is the tastiest, and we have come to drink it.” On 12/8/09, on Al-Shabab TV in Egypt, Egyptian cleric Hamdan Badr, a member of the International Association of Muslim Scholars, justified the General’s statement by saying: “This didn’t constitute aggression because we were defending the borders of the Islamic state. We are commanded to enjoin people to worship Allah. That is the mission of every Muslim in this life.” (there’s a video of this on You Tube).

And where are those “borders of the Islamic state”?
-7/5/11 Daily Mail, London: Islamic extremists have called on British Muslims to establish three independent states within the UK.

Why are they so bold?
-1/29/07 Daily Telegraph UK: 40% of Muslims, ages 16 to 24, want Sharia law; 13% admire al-Qaeda; 36% believe apostates should be executed; 75% believe that women should wear veils.
-7/27/08 Sunday Times UK: 33% of Muslim students support killing for islam; 33% want world Islamic law.
-3/8/10 Daily Telegraph: Sharia courts in Britain have already judged that a man may have up to four wives at any one time; that a wife has no property rights in the event of divorce; that a woman may not leave her home without her husband's consent; and that a woman cannot marry without the presence and permission of a male guardian.

Answer 8

and all are worse for it. Since when did letting people poop where others eat ever become "a good idea"