Is there a difference between being against multiculturalism and being for segregation?

Question

or being racist?

Answer 1

Nope

Answer 2

Multi-culturalism creates an us and them. As soon as you create an us and them you create prejudice against the them whoever they may be. That's just human nature. Hand 100 people a golf tee, hand another hundred people a toothpick, put them in a room and before you know it folks are fighting over which it's better to have and thinking they are the better for having this or that.

True racial harmony can only come from unifying factors. A single primary culture is an absolute must to create an environment where this can happen. People have to have an overriding commonality that makes us all us instead of us and them. If they are one of us their differences are far easier to tolerate and negative stereotypes will be greatly diminished. After all their one of us thus anything you say bad about another one of us reflects on all.

Multi-culturalism creates isolationism. The two key components of prejudice is isolation and ignorance. If you have nothing in common with people of "that" culture then you and they are isolated from each other and totally ignorant of the other's ways and beliefs. You lack that commonality to sit down and be friends and actually find out what the other person is like.

So if you want to promote racism promote multiculturalism. You want genocide there is no surer recipe for genocide than a whole lot of nations battling within the same boundaries for the same resources.

Answer 3

What's wrong with segregation. If you look around at any high school or college campus you will see voluntary segregation on racial lines.

Answer 4

Everybody says there's this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and "assimilating" with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Answer 5

Still off your meds, I see...

Answer 6

Most people who say they are against multiculturalism don't know what multiculturalism means.

Answer 7

segregation is historically racist

anti-multiculturalism tends to lean towards segregation in as much as the people against multiculturalism do not want other cultures in their nation, neighborhood, & so on.

I'll let you draw a conclusion from that

Answer 8

Totally big difference.