Leonardo DiCaprio's body odour killing love life?
Leonardo DiCaprio refuses to use deodorant.
The 37-year-old actor has reportedly upset girlfriend Erin Heatherton with his poor personal hygiene, which is down to his fears for the environment and passion for conservation.
A source explained: "Leo has let his love for the environment take over his whole world and it's killing his love life.
"He only showers a couple of days a week to conserve water and he considers deodorant to be unnatural.
"Erin loves him dearly but is starting to feel like Leo loves the environment more than her."
Leonardo is said to be an "avid" recycler, but regularly misses the pick up days, leaving his kitchen with a foul odour from the rubbish left behind.
The source added to National Enquirer magazine: "Erin has warned him to clean up his act and his hygiene. If not, he may wind up chasing off the woman of his dreams."
Leonardo isn't the only star to have been criticised for their poor personal hygiene.
It has previously been claimed that Robert Pattinson rarely showers and has upset cast and crew on the 'Twilight Saga' with his pungent body odour.
A source close to the star - who plays vampire Edward Cullen in the film franchise - previously said: "He stinks. I mean, it's awful. He never showers, and it drives people on the set crazy. He completely reeks."
© Copyright (c) The Province
- Anonymous9 years agoFavorite Answer
It's actually better to take showers at least 2-5 days a week. The oil for your hair is good. If you take showers every day with hot water, blow dry it, etc, you're basically damaging your hair. But if they truly stink that bad....I mean, I'm sure they've heard of cologne. I'm pretty sure they'd put some on. As for Leonardo DiCaprio, if he doesn't like deodorant, maybe he should try spray deodorant instead.
- Anonymous4 years ago
As international warming will become a controversy in our prevalent lives, it nevertheless looks impossible get anybody on board in the past that's too previous due? there are such assorted poorer international locations fairly incapable of setting up any form of recycling centers, toxins monitoring/administration ministries, and so on. Why would be unable to the industrialized international locations (being the main important of the polluters) social gathering and variety a international climate Coalition? in spite of each and every little thing, it extremely is a international subject, and finger pointing could no longer remedy it. each and according to annum a element of the taxes that they assemble could be prepare in a extensive pot, and below the supervision of an elected board, they use this funds to combat toxins/international warming reasons interior the less than-more advantageous international locations. those industrialized international locations are so wealthy that there is no reason that they are able to't locate the money for this, nor can they locate the money for to no longer try this for generations to come back.