Is this the first time The U.S. Department of Justice Confirmed the right to record Police actions?
The U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division has urged a federal court to side with a Howard County man in a lawsuit over his cellphone being seized by Baltimore police at the Preakness Stakes after he filmed officers making an arrest.
The federal attorneys say the lawsuit "presents constitutional questions of great moment in this digital age." They asked U.S. District Judge Benson Everett Legg to rule that citizens have a right to record police officers and that officers who seize and destroy recordings without a warrant or due process are violating the Fourth and 14th amendments.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, which is representing the plaintiff, Christopher Sharp, said it believes this is the first time the Department of Justice has weighed in on the topic of recording police.
"The right to record police officers while performing duties in a public place as well as the right to be protected from the warrantless seizure and destruction of those recordings, are not only required by the Constitution," Justice Department attorneys wrote in a "statement of interest" filed Jan. 10 in the case. "They are consistent with our fundamental notions of liberty, promote the accountability of our governmental officers, and instill public confidence in the police officers who serve us daily."
- darren mLv 78 years agoFavorite Answer
nah 1980's hand held cameras on drug arrests and pretty much any arrest were also issues .
seized because cops said part of investigation and courts required as evidence .
<supress thought> Greed good> obey consume> what corps tell . ,supress thoughts on computer knowlege>computer code.Source(s): corporations. 1980's archives u.s. world news 190's-1990's