Atheists answer this regarding evolution?
There is no real evidence that proves that one species becomes another they use arguments like well there is similar DNA in Chimps as there is in Humans so what there is similarity with a bus and a car the car did not suddenly become a bus it took a intelligence using similar material. the fact there is some mutations in a species and similarities with a other species is not proof that one became another that is speculation from the observer.I could argue that a intelligence call him God made all life some he used similar DNA and material. Some species have in the DNA the opportunity to create mutations if the need arises change of climate but there still the same species.
- lhvinnyLv 78 years agoBest Answer
"There is no real evidence that proves that one species becomes another" Oh really? So I guess all these people lied then:
Frank J. Sulloway (1982). "The Beagle collections of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae)". Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology Series 43 (2): 49–58.
MATTHEW L. NIEMILLER, BENJAMIN M. FITZPATRICK, BRIAN T. MILLER (2008). "Recent divergence with gene flow in Tennessee cave salamanders (Plethodontidae: Gyrinophilus) inferred from gene genealogies". Molecular Ecology 17 (9): 2258–2275.
E.B. TAYLOR, J.D. McPHAIL (2000). "Historical contingency and determinism interact to prime speciation in sticklebacks". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267 (1460): 2375–2384.
Feder JL, Roethele JB, Filchak K, Niedbalski J, Romero-Severson J (1 March 2003). "Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella". Genetics 163 (3): 939–53.
Berlocher SH, Bush GL (1982). "An electrophoretic analysis of Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) phylogeny". Systematic Zoology 31 (2): 136–55.
Rice, W.R. and G.W. Salt (1988). "Speciation via disruptive selection on habitat preference: experimental evidence". The American Naturalist 131: 911–917.
Dodd, D.M.B. (1989). "Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura". Evolution 43 (6): 1308–1311.
Mavarez, J.; Salazar, C.A., Bermingham, E., Salcedo, C., Jiggins, C.D. , Linares, M. (2006). "Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies". Nature 441 (7095): 868–71.
Minkel, J.R. (September 8, 2006) "Wandering Fly Gene Supports New Model of Speciation" Science News
Hobolth A, Christensen OF, Mailund T, Schierup MH (2007) "Genomic Relationships and Speciation Times of Human, Chimpanzee, and Gorilla Inferred from a Coalescent Hidden Markov Model."
Please note that the apologetic website Answers in Genesis even discourages people like you from making this type of argument.
So much fail...
- CrazyworldLv 58 years ago
A skeptic or atheist is governed by two main principles: 1) all beliefs must be supported by observational evidence, and 2) beliefs that contradict observational evidence cannot be tolerated. However, strong atheism states that there is no god, even though observational evidence indicates that the universe has a cause that cannot be detected observationally. So despite the lack of observational evidence for a naturalistic cause for the universe, the strong atheist believes that the universe has a naturalistic cause and that there is no god, contradicting the tenet that all beliefs should be based upon observational evidence. Adaptation (known as evolution by most atheists) has been observed and therefore is evidence. Evolution in terms of specie rendering new specie has NEVER been observed yet atheists are fully bought into the evolution without God lie! Why? Because accepting God's existence means accountability.
A transitional fossil is any fossilized remains of a lifeform that "exhibits characteristics" (might as well say "kinda like") of two distinct (different, not the same) taxonomic groups (species, family, class,group etc.). A transitional fossil is the fossil of an organism "NEAR" the (THEORIZED)branching point where major individual lineages (clades) (MAY)diverge. It will have characteristics typical of organisms on both sides of the split, but because of the ************* ******** <**********<<<<<< INCOMPLETENESS >>>>>>***** of the fossil record, there is usually no way to know exactly how close it is to the (NEVER OBSERVED AND SPECULATIVE) actual point of divergence (WE THINK).
HOW DOES AN "INCOMPLETE FOSSIL RECORD" AND THE PHRASE "there is usually no way to know exactly how close it is to the actual point of divergence" INDICATE FACT!
not to mention the idea of divergence is speculative without the support of fossils to verify the truth regarding divergence!
- 8 years ago
species are defined in science, not nature, so if scientists call something a new species, then its defined as a new species. This has nothing to do with transformation.
Evolution has nothing to do with transformation.
Rather, nature plays trial and error with the mutations of genes in living organisms.
Mutations in the same species occur, until its radical enough for scientists to define the mutation as a new species.
What you are saying is not what modern scientists believes evolution to be
so stop getting all these religious types hyped up (*cough* ILoveDollyP *cough*) that they have something against us agnostics and atheists, troll.
- MordentLv 78 years ago
"Some species have in the DNA the opportunity to create mutations if the need arises" - and if they change enough, what happens then?
You get a new species.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- John J. SLv 78 years ago
Almost identical is not exactly "similar. Similar is grub wormDNA is similar to human DNA= 75+% identical Bweing oner gene short as ONLY difference is not similar.
Sorry but that is the evidence and it is there if you would take your nose out of yopur bible and stick it in a few graduate level Microbiology symposia.
- RenLv 58 years ago
Mutations happen, yes we know this. When mutations continue to occur...you will eventually have a new species....it just takes millions of years to see it happen.Source(s): Atheist.
- 8 years ago
Circular arguments may sound convincing to the critical thinking impaired crowd, but you're going to have to try a little harder to convince thinking people that you have a cogent argument worthy of being
Please give critical thinking a chance and make room for some skepticism in your praxis, I guarantee it won't hurt your brain.Source(s): Juxtaposition
- Lionel1020Lv 68 years ago
There is a mountain of evidence for evolution
There is no real evidence that proves you have a brain
- Anonymous8 years ago
You are right, and that's a very good argument, but these stubborn Atheists won't budge. Have a good day now in the Lord!!! Jesus created all things. It says so in John 1:1-3, Col. 1:16, Rev. 4:11, etc.
- FleshgodLv 58 years ago
This belongs in the Biology section. What's the matter? Afraid scientists will shut you up?