what's the difference between Blues and Jazz music?
Recently I've become interested in both these genres (blues more than jazz since I already listen to lots of folk music). But I really am confused the specific differences between the genres. I thought jazz was like a band with saxophone and piano but the jazz station is playing Ella Fitzgerald, Frank Sinatra, etc singers like them
- MamiankaLv 79 years agoFavorite Answer
Jazz covers a wide variety of styles, from ragtime and Dixieland to swing to bebop to alternative - and a whole lot more in between. The focus is always on creativity and improvisation - sometimes if is difficult for a new listener to even follow where the original melody goes, when players start improvising on it! Similarly, the rhythmic and harmonic structures, which started out as part of the accompaniment, are also expected to leave the normal world behind, and take off into flights of fancy. So not only is somebody redecorating the rooms - the whole house has moved to another state.
Blues tends to be more adherent to its roots,especially in its use of phrase and chordal structure. Like barbecue ribs, however, each major city had it variations on that formula. But in its essence, 12 bars, 3 chords. This makes is easy to follow, and the lyrics are slower and they repeat - so it is easier for the audience to keep up.
Musicians have an old joke that reflects on the contrast - and the relative popularity - between traditional blue, and progressive, atonal jazz:
"What is the difference between blues, and modern jazz?"
"A blues musician plays three chords, in front of thousands of people. A modern jazz musician plays thousands of chords - in front of three people."
The Ella and Frank things you are hearing are 32-bar standards; Frank may deviate from the melody some, and add his own phrasing; Ella will do that, and also in up-tempo tunes, she will "scat' - use her voice like an instrument, using no words, but free syllables that allow her the freedom to improvise melodic passages just like an instrumentalist would do. Although not invented by her, she was the queen of this skill.
If you can get it - and sit thru it all - get the Ken Burns series on jazz as a video (several in a box). you will learn a ton. Also watch the HBO series Treme. Go to the Jazz at Lincoln Center site - and watch shows in which Wynton Marsalis talks about jazz as well as playing. You have a lot on your plate - but it is all tasty.
- KateLv 49 years ago
Scaruffi writes that jazz was always primarily an instrumental style, while blues was first and foremost vocal. Scaruffi notes that the main musical difference between jazz and blues is that jazz contains heavy syncopation, which was derived from ragtime music.
Bill Dahl writes that blues music is technically defined by a I-IV-V chord sequence with a 12-bar motif. Herman adds that vocally, the blues is characterized by three-line rhymed stanzas with repeating verses. Flattening the third, fifth and seventh notes of the melody makes for a blues sound, Herman writes.
With their distinct origins and geographies, the two musical styles developed their own stars. Scaruffi reports that the first jazz album was recorded by Edward "Kid" Ory and his Creole Orchestra. Early stars included Louis Armstrong, Jimmie Noone and George Lewis. In the 1950s and 1960s, legends like Miles Davis and John Coltrane became household names.
The blues, in turn, boasted players such as Robert Johnson, who was known as "the King of Delta Blues," and Blind Lemon Jefferson. The Memphis band conductor W.C. Handy, and electric blues stars B.B. King and Howlin' Wolf, retain a vast influence over contemporary blues artists.
- Brad B. No. 5Lv 69 years ago
As far as I am aware, jazz does not typically have vocalists while blues usually does. Blues are more upbeat while jazz is more relaxing.
I never really got into jazz much, but each their own
- Anonymous9 years ago
Y U NO MUSIC!?