what's the differences between 1960s and today 2011 protest ?

I have to write a comparison essay but i dont know what's the differences between 1960s and today 2011 protest ?

7 Answers

  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Barack Obama is the difference and the goals of the protests. Obama wants a one world government.

    Barack Obama and his destruction of the United States is definitely "on purpose" and here is why:

    He is a devout Muslim, do not be fooled.

    Look at his Czars...anti-business. .anti-American.

    As Glenn Beck correctly predicted from day one, Barack Hussein Obama is

    following the plan of Cloward & Piven, two professors at Columbia University ..

    They outlined a plan to socialize America by overwhelming the system

    with government spending and entitlement demands.

    Add up the clues below. Taken individually they're alarming.

    Taken as a whole, it is a brilliant, Machiavellian game plan to turn the United States into a socialist/Marxist state with a permanent majority that desperately needs government for survival ... and can be counted on to always vote for bigger government.

    Why not? They have no responsibility to pay for it.

    Universal health care.. The health care bill had very little to do with health care. It had everything to do with unionizing millions of hospital and health care workers, as well as adding 15,000 to 20,000 new IRS agents (who will join government employee unions).

    Obama doesn't care that giving free health care to 30 million Americans will add trillions to the national debt.

    What he does care about is that it cements the dependence of those 30 million voters to Democrats and big government. Who but a socialist revolutionary would pass this reckless spending bill in the middle of a depression?

    Cap and trade. Like health care legislation having nothing to do with

    health care, cap and trade has nothing to do with global warming.

    It has everything to do with redistribution of income, government control

    of the economy and a criminal payoff to Obama's biggest contributors.

    Those powerful and wealthy unions and contributors (like GE, which owns

    NBC, MSNBC and CNBC) can then be counted on to support everything Obama wants.

    They will kick-back hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to Obama and the Democratic Party to keep them in power.

    The bonus is that all the new taxes on Americans with bigger cars, bigger homes and businesses helps Obama "spread the wealth around."

    Make Puerto Rico a state. Why? Who's asking for a 51st state?

    Who's asking for millions of new welfare recipients and government entitlement addicts in the middle of a depression? Certainly not American taxpayers. But this has been Barack Hussein Obama's plan all along.

    His goal is to add two new Democrat senators, five Democrat congressman and a million loyal Democratic voters who are dependent on big government.

    Legalize 12 million illegal Mexican immigrants.

    Just giving these 12 million potential new citizens free health care alone could overwhelm the system and bankrupt America . But it adds 12 million reliable new Democrat voters who can be counted on to support big government. Add another few trillion dollars in welfare, aid to dependent children,

    food stamps, free medical, education, tax credits for the poor, and eventually Social Security.

    Stimulus and bailouts. Where did all that money go?

    It went to Democrat contributors, organizations (ACORN), and unions -- including billions of dollars to save or create jobs of government employees across the country.

    It went to save GM and Chrysler so that their employees could keep paying union dues.

    It went to AIG so that Goldman Sachs could be bailed out (after giving Obama almost $1 million in contributions).

    A staggering $125 billion went to teachers (thereby protecting their union dues).

    All those public employees will vote loyally Democrat to protect their bloated salaries and pensions that are bankrupting America .

    The country goes broke, future generations face a bleak future, but Obama, the Democrat Party, government, and the unions grow more powerful.

    The ends justify the means.

    Raise taxes on small business owners, high-income earners, and job creators. Put the entire burden on only the top 20 percent of taxpayers, redistribute the income, punish success, and reward those who did nothing to deserve it (except vote for Obama).

    Reagan wanted to dramatically cut taxes in order to starve the government. Barack Obama wants to dramatically raise taxes to starve his political opposition. With the acts outlined above, Barack Hussein Obama and his regime have created a vast and rapidly expanding constituency of voters dependent on big government; a vast privileged class of public employees who work for big government; and a government dedicated to destroying capitalism and installing themselves as socialist rulers by overwhelming the system.

    Add it up and you've got the perfect Marxist scheme -- all devised by

    my Columbia University college classmate Barack Hussein Obama using the Cloward and Piven Plan.

    "Correctly attributed" says snopes!


  • 9 years ago

    the 60s protests were about a pointless bloody war and trying to get freedom for black people and were for the most part very peaceful. The protests involved music and were about peace and equality. the 2011 protests are about wanting money that isn't yours, not having to pay off loans and free handouts. They involve inconveniencing people in their daily lives and yelling at school children

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    The 1960's protests had realistic goals.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    In the 1960s, they didn't realize how pointless protesting was, nor did they realize what losers protesters are, nor what a failure progressivism is. But now we have 50 years of history to show us.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Protestors in the 1960s were fighting an illegitimate war or real human rights problems. Protestors today are whining because they expect others to supply them with a living, rather than having to work for it themselves.

  • 9 years ago

    The were protesting a war, today they are protesting Corporatism

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    They protested in grainy black and white in the 60s.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.