Since certain users think I'm lying about Bayes' Theorem regarding the probability of God existing...?
In the attached question, one user claimed that I'm lying about Bayes' Theorem, and that it in fact proves God's existence, rather than what I actually claimed, which is that absence of evidence is evidence of absence, NOT that it somehow proves that God does not exist.
At any rate, here's your chance to explain where I lied. Attached is the original question with my post and the claim that I lied, with no further explanation from the person who said that I lied. Please explain: how exactly did I lie? What did I say that was inaccurate?