We have assessed the methodological quality of study.
However, there exist no gold standards as to which criteria
should be used in the quality assessment of study
designs related to vesical dysfunction post RH. We have,
therefore, decided to rate the studies according to internal
validity such as: design of the study, sample size, follow-up
time and quality of the measures used. Complete urodynamic
data was considered as definition of all urodynamic
disturbances according to ICS classification (overactive
bladder/low compliance, atonic bladder/high compliance,
stress urinary incontinence, mixed urinary incontinence).
Methodological assessments were performed following criteria
explained in Table 2. Maximum score comprised 9 points,and a quality score of≥5 was set as a study with good
- 阿昌Lv 79 years agoFavorite Answer