Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do Gaussian integers form a group under multiplication?

Could you please show a full general proof checking for identity, closed, inverse and so on

PLEASE HELP AND SHOW WORKING !!!! :)

2 Answers

Relevance
  • David
    Lv 7
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    to make thing clear, i will assume in the following:

    z = a+bi, where a,b are integers

    w = c+di, where c,d are integers

    u = h+ki, where h,k are integers

    strictly speaking, the answer straight-away is no, only the non-zero numbers could possibly qualify, since 0 = 0+0i can not possibly have a an inverse. we will see later, that other elements do not, as well.

    first, we check closure:

    zw = (a+bi)(c+di) = a(c+di) + (bi)(c+di) = ac + adi + bci + bd(i^2)

    = (ac-bd) + (ad+bc)i, wich is in Z[i], since ac-bd and ad+bc are both integers.

    next, we check associativity:

    (zw)u = [(a+bi)(c+di)](h+ki)

    = [(ac-bd) + (ad+bc)i](h+ki)

    = (ac-bd)h - (ad+bc)k + [(ac-bd)k + (ad+bc)h]i

    = ach - bdh - adk + bck + (ack - bdk + adh + bch)i

    = a(ch-dk) - b(ck+dh) + (a(ck+dh) + b(ch-dk))i

    = (a+bi)[(ch-dk) + (ck+dh)i] = (a+bi)[(c+di)(h+ki)]

    = z(wu). associativity is proved.

    let 1 = 1+0i:

    then z(1) = (a+bi)(1+0i) = a(1) - b(0) + (a(0) + b(1))i

    = a+bi, while (1)z = (1+0i)(a+bi) = (1)a - (0)b + ((1)b + (0)a)i

    = a+bi, so 1 = 1+0i is an identity.

    unfortunately Z[i] does not contain all inverses.

    let v = v+0i, where v is an integer greater than 1.

    suppose v had an inverse 1/v = (m+ni).

    then (v+0i)(m+ni) = 1+0i.

    but (v+0i)(m+ni) = vm - 0n + (vn + 0m)i = vm + vni

    thus vm = 1, and vn = 0.

    since v ≠ 0, this means n = 0, so 1/v is of the form m = m+0i.

    but vm = 1, so m must be 1/v.

    since v is an integer > 1, 1/v is a positive integer less than 1,

    but no such thing exists.

  • Andy
    Lv 4
    10 years ago

    No.

    Obviously they're closed under multiplication, and there is an identity element 1.

    But there are no inverses. Consider the number z=3+4i, for instance. We have |z|=5, so if an inverse element z* exists then it must satisfy |z|=1/5, which is impossible since Gaussian integers have integer moduli.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.