Lv 7
? asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 9 years ago


Fremont, CA, March 20, 2009 – Solyndra, Inc. announced today that it is the first company to receive an offer for a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) loan guarantee under Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Solyndra, a Fremont, California-based manufacturer of innovative cylindrical photovoltaic systems, will use the proceeds of a $535 million loan from the U.S. Treasury’s Federal Financing Bank to expand its solar panel manufacturing capacity in California.

“The leadership and actions of President Barack Obama, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and the U.S. Congress were instrumental in concluding this offer for a loan guarantee,” said Solyndra CEO and founder, Dr. Chris Gronet. “The DOE Loan Guarantee Program funding will enable Solyndra to achieve the economies of scale needed to deliver solar electricity at prices that are competitive with utility rates. This expansion is really about creating new jobs while meaningfully impacting global warming.”


The Bush administration had turned down their application - TWICE.

8 Answers

  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because 15 million of it went straight to Obama.

    Source(s): Mafioso Behavior
  • brokaw
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Why ? "POLITICAL PAYBACK FOR OBAMA SUPPORTERS !!!" right here`s somewhat tidbit of information: that the liberal bias` lame circulate media isn't reporting on ; i ask your self why ?? September 26, 2011 ... The Washington situations comments: Solyndra Lists California Democratic party as Creditor Out of the masses of out-of-paintings workers, distributors, traders and different lenders in the financial disaster of government-subsidized photograph voltaic-panel maker Solyndra LLC, one call stands proud: the California Democratic party. Why California Democrats could be creditor to a enterprise that gained extra desirable than a a million/2-billion income federal loans to construct a photo voltaic-panel plant isn’t sparkling. Even party officers say they’re uncertain. Obama hopes you have faith this bullshit of an answer ~ The California Democratic party’s communications director, Tenoch Flores, reported the corporate became not owed “any income any form” by using the California-based enterprise. He reported he became doubtful why the party could be indexed as a creditor in Solyndra’s financial disaster submitting. in accordance to marketing campaign-finance documents, Solyndra donated $7,500 to the California Democratic party in October 2010. It’s criminal in California for companies to make donations. ***yet that doesn’t clarify why the enterprise could % out the Democratic party as a creditor in its financial disaster submitting a year later.*** upload that to the checklist of questions Solyndra executives have yet to respond to.

  • 9 years ago

    Because one of Solyndra owners, Kaiser, has been a huge donor for the Obama 2008 campaign.

  • The same reason Enron was given a special exemption from accounting rules by the Clinton adminstration.

    Democrats corrupt our entire system.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    July 2005: The Bush Administration signs the Energy Policy Act of 2005 into law, creating the 1703 loan guarantee program.

    February 2006 – October 2006: In February, Solyndra raises its first round of venture financing worth $10.6 million from CMEA Capital, Redpoint Ventures, and U.S. Venture Partners. In October, Argonaut Venture Capital, an investment arm of George Kaiser, invests $17 million into Solyndra. Madrone Capital Partners, an investment arm of the Walton family, invests $7 million. Those investments are part of a $78.2 million fund.

    December 2006: Solyndra Applies for a Loan Guarantee under the 1703 program.

    Late 2007: Loan guarantee program is funded. Solyndra was one of 16 clean-tech companies deemed ready to move forward in the due diligence process. The Bush Administration DOE moves forward to develop a conditional commitment.

    October 2008: Then Solyndra CEO Chris Gronet touted reasons for building in Silicon Valley and noted that the “company’s second factory also will be built in Fremont, since a Department of Energy loan guarantee mandates a U.S. location.”

    November 2008: Silicon prices remain very high on the spot market, making non-silicon based thin film technologies like Solyndra’s very attractive to investors. Solyndra also benefits from having very low installation costs. The company raises $144 million from ten different venture investors, including the Walton-family run Madrone Capital Partners. This brings total private investment to more than $450 million to date.

    January 2009: In an effort to show it has done something to support renewable energy, the Bush Administration tries to take Solyndra before a DOE credit review committee before President Obama is inaugurated. The committee, consisting of career civil servants with financial expertise, remands the loan back to DOE “without prejudice” because it wasn’t ready for conditional commitment.

    March 2009: The same credit committee approves the strengthened loan application. The deal passes on to DOE’s credit review board. Career staff (not political appointees) within the DOE issue a conditional commitment setting out terms for a guarantee.

    June 2009: As more silicon production facilities come online while demand for PV wavers due to the economic slowdown, silicon prices start to drop. Meanwhile, the Chinese begin rapidly scaling domestic manufacturing and set a path toward dramatic, unforeseen cost reductions in PV. Between June of 2009 and August of 2011, PV prices drop more than 50%.

    September 2009: Solyndra raises an additional $219 million. Shortly after, the DOE closes a $535 million loan guarantee after six months of due diligence. This is the first loan guarantee issued under the 1703 program. From application to closing, the process took three years – not the 41 days that is sometimes reported. OMB did raise some concerns in August not about the loan itself but how the loan should be “scored.” OMB testified Wednesday that they were comfortable with the final scoring.

    January – June 2010: As the price of conventional silicon-based PV continues to fall due to low silicon prices and a glut of solar modules, investors and analysts start questioning Solyndra’s ability to compete in the marketplace. Despite pulling its IPO (as dozens of companies did in 2010), Solyndra raises an additional $175 million from investors.

    November 2010: Solyndra closes an older manufacturing facility and concentrates operations at Fab 2, the plant funded by the $535 million loan guarantee. The Fab 2 plant is completed that same month — on time and on budget — employing around 3,000 construction workers during the build-out, just as the DOE projected.

    February 2011: Due to a liquidity crisis, investors provide $75 million to help restructure the loan guarantee. The DOE rightly assumed it was better to give Solyndra a fighting chance rather than liquidate the company – which was a going concern – for market value, which would have guaranteed significant losses.

    March 2011: Republican Representatives complain that DOE funds are not being spent quickly enough.House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI): “despite the Administration’s urgency and haste to pass the bill [the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act] … billions of dollars have yet to be spent.”

    And House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Cliff Stearns (R-FL): “The whole point of the Democrat’s stimulus bill was to spend billions of dollars … most of the money still hasn’t been spent.”

    June 2011: Average selling prices for solar modules drop to $1.50 a watt and continue on a pathway to $1 a watt. Solyndra says it has cut costs by 50%, but analysts worry how the company will compete with the dramatic changes in conventional PV.

    August 2011: DOE refuses to restructure the loan a second time.


    Source: Clean Technica (http://s.tt/13giD)

  • ?
    Lv 6
    9 years ago


  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Crony corruption from a corrupt regime, plain and simple.

  • That is the democratic corruption that forces me to vote republican weather I want to or not.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.