promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted

Do you believe Amanda Knox killed Meredith Kercher?

Do you think she is guilty? Why or why not? I'd just like to see what the people around the world believe. I'm not really sure if I believe she did it or not. Tell me whatcha think!

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Of course not.

    "I'm an American in Italy, and have followed the case from day one."

    This means he learned about the case from what was in the Italian news. Had he read an American newspaper he would know that the case against her is a crock of ****.

    " Anyone who thinks she is innocent, does not know the first fact about the case."

    No, anyone who believes she is guilty knows the lies and believes them.

    "meredith was butchered in horrific style."

    No she was stabbed a few times.

    "The police have no DOUBTS that Guede was there, but insist he had HELP. "

    The Italian police thought Patrick Mubumba killed her.

    Then the German police caught Rudy Guede. His DNA matched what was found on meredith so they had to accept Guede did it and the Germans succeeded where they had failed.

    "The crime scene was also "tidied up" before cops were called."

    The wops, oops I mean the cops, believe Amanda cleaned the room in a way that removed every trace of her DNA but left samples of other peoples.

    "Amanda lied repeatedly to the investigtors,........changed her story 6 times, and the FACTS did not back up the many alibi's she tried to create. She has alternatively said she was there, and then insisted she wasn't. She has done NOTHING except throw doubt and suspision upon herself, with her ever changing story."

    Amanda has always said she was at her boyfriends that night and does not know what happened. During her 50 hour interrogation the cops slapped her around and forced her to say that she was in the kitchen and heard Meredith scream when she was attacked. Amanda said that did not happen, after the interrogation.

    I could go on quoting the rest of this trolls post, and I could tell you how everything he claims is false, but that would be feeding a troll.

    The most likely scenerio is, some joke or game went awry. Yes, Rudy may have did the cutting, but they were both there. They both certainly acted pretty guilty when they arrested. and they BOTH LIED. Their ALIBI was a LIE. That was PROVED.

    So what are they LYING about, if they are innocent? and if their alibi is a proven lie.......then their whereabouts at the time of the murder are still UNKNOWN.

    Except they are known, because DNA evidence was found on Kerchers BRA.

    Prosecutors believe someone had to be holding Meredith down, for RUDY to inflict the amout of damage he did.

    I dont think.........I KNOW all 3 are guilty as sin, but once again, ala Casey Anthony and OJ Simspon......we get to watch people wriggle off the hook on legal mumbo jumbo.

    She WAS found guilty of trying to FRAME the TRULY innocent man, and got THREE years in jail for that. So she clearly had no trouble framing someone else for the crime,

    Does that sound innocent to you? and all her lies and appeals, didn't get THAT charge overturned.

    She's a convicted and proven LIAR at least.

    * 2 hours ago

    * Report Abuse

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 9 years ago

    I'm an American in Italy, and have followed the case from day one. Anyone who thinks she is innocent, does not know the first fact about the case.

    meredith was butchered in horrific style. The police have no DOUBTS that Guede was there, but insist he had HELP. The crime scene was also "tidied up" before cops were called.

    Amanda lied repeatedly to the investigtors,........changed her story 6 times, and the FACTS did not back up the many alibi's she tried to create. She has alternatively said she was there, and then insisted she wasn't. She has done NOTHING except throw doubt and suspision upon herself, with her ever changing story.

    The most likely scenerio is, some joke or game went awry. Yes, Rudy may have did the cutting, but they were both there. They both certainly acted pretty guilty when they arrested. and they BOTH LIED. Their ALIBI was a LIE. That was PROVED.

    So what are they LYING about, if they are innocent? and if their alibi is a proven lie.......then their whereabouts at the time of the murder are still UNKNOWN.

    Except they are known, because DNA evidence was found on Kerchers BRA.

    Prosecutors believe someone had to be holding Meredith down, for RUDY to inflict the amout of damage he did.

    I dont think.........I KNOW all 3 are guilty as sin, but once again, ala Casey Anthony and OJ Simspon......we get to watch people wriggle off the hook on legal mumbo jumbo.

    She WAS found guilty of trying to FRAME the TRULY innocent man, and got THREE years in jail for that. So she clearly had no trouble framing someone else for the crime,

    Does that sound innocent to you? and all her lies and appeals, didn't get THAT charge overturned.

    She's a convicted and proven LIAR at least.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 9 years ago

    Well, the black guy is guilty. And the white girl is innocent. That is what one judge reportedly said "he could tell looking at their faces". As far as the law goes, this is the current position.

    The lovebirds have a lot of explaining to do which they are not doing. Her boyfriend has also said that they have fabricated alibis together to be consistent.

    ALL EVIDENCES are circumstantial in nature. Always. Motive is always in the mind and can never be proved but only guessed. There is evidence that they both were at the scene when the victim died but they had very good connections and very good lawyers.

    If she were really innocent, why her family has to spend over 2 million dollars? I do not know how much her boyfriend spent for the trail. But then the cardinal rule is that "not only justice should be done but it must appear to be done" - has failed.

    When people lose faith in the process of justice, it is a terrible day.

    Source(s): truejustice.org
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 9 years ago

    Yes - she lied, tried to frame the black guy - there was only uproar because of a US media frenzy - what about Kercher huh - where's her justice. If the evidence was flawed a proper retrial should have taken place. Knox should have been jailed for contempt on the lies alone. If she had been in the US she would be on death row as there are more innocents there than her - if she makes money of this it proves the sickness endemic in the US!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • bigda
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    No, I don't. She used to be railroaded through a medieval-minded prosecutor who used to be on not anything in need of a witch hunt. There used to be correctly, no proof that ever based Amanda Knox used to be the killer or perhaps a social gathering to the crime. More importantly, that identical prosecutor within the first trial knew this early on however refused to back down as a way to retailer face. It used to be a travesty of giant percentage. The truly killer used to be the only finally convicted of the crime, Rudy Guede and he acted on my own. As a ways because the kissing and lingerie looking - not anything like making whatever out of not anything! They truthfully portrayed her a 'sexual sorceress' within the Italian press. In truth, the kisses had been kisses of remedy and help NOT supposed to offend any individual however the Italian media blew the whole factor out of percentage to hold the general public riled. And the lingerie - the woman used to be NEVER allowed again into her condo for any intent. She had no garments however the ones on her again. Does it make feel to you, she needed to do somewhat of looking? Again, for the reason that she occurred to be photographed whilst shopping lingerie, the media milked it for all it used to be valued at. Take the time to learn somewhat approximately the Salem witch hunts/trials that took situation in Colonial America (overdue 1600s.) It rings a bell in my memory of the mind-set of this Italian prosecutor, as good because the media mania, (that's fitting increasingly of a situation all over the place.) Amanda Knox used to be particularly fortunate to have had a moment trial, earlier than a pass judgement on who in reality understood the information of the case AND the legislation. Edit: @Nutster - not anything used to be 'stifled' within the U.S. media. We heard all approximately the allegations you could have stated and extra. 'Freak and intercourse addict?' Again, that witch hunt mentality. Those sound like ordinary university age scholar behaviors to me, not anything extra. Re-trial? Mignini consists of a vendetta - allow him. He can take this to the maximum courtroom must he pick to. However, at the side of an extradition request, you have got to exhibit proof of guilt - they've none, except of direction they fabricate it. Edit: Everything you could have acknowledged isn't 'proof', they're reviews and none of the ones reviews make Amanda Knox a killer. I must have recognized your remark used to be effectively bias as opposed to actually comparing the truly proof towards her (which used to be none) and your further feedback make that much more transparent. Take yet another pot-shot for the reason that she's American - no longer unexpected certainly!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 9 years ago

    I am not in Italy but still from circumstantial evidences of the cases as shown by the media, she is definitely guilty.Her acquittal is more of a suspect than of a fair justice dispensation.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    No, there is lack of forensic evidence that she killed Meredith Kercher.

    There is DNA evidence for Rudy Guede all over the place where Meredith died, and even on Meredith's body. He obviously raped and killed her.

    On the other hand, there is no real motive for Amanda Knox to kill Meredith Kercher.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    NO DEFINITELY NOT.

    that sex game scenario is totally unrealistic.

    this is real life with a violent rape and murder not a porno scene!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.