How can we keep ignoring that vaccines are dangerous with studies like these?
In the study's introduction, the authors note that infant mortality rate (IMR) is one of the most important measures of children's health and overall development in countries. In developing nations, IMRs are higher because the basic necessities, such as clean water, good nutrition, good sanitation, and easy access to health care, are lacking or unevenly distributed. In developed nations, such as the US, these factors do not come into play and are not primarily responsible for IMR statistics.
n this study, a literature review was conducted to compare the immunization schedules for infants under the age of one in the United States with the other 33 nations with better IMRs. The study was conducted by separating the nations into one of five groups based on the number of vaccine doses they routinely give their infants in the first year of life. The groups were: 1214, 1517, 1820, 2123, and 2426 vaccine doses. The US gives the highest number at 26 doses in the first year of life.
These groups were then compared for IMR in relationship to the number of vaccines given. The results of the study showed a direct linear correlation between the number of vaccines given to infants and the IMR. As the number of vaccines given to infants increases, so does the death rate among infants.
The Barbara Loe Fisher, NVIC article and video can be seen at: http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/Ma...
Red Angel - Excellent point. thank you
Patrick M - I dont see anything that you are contributing with any data. This MEDICAL journal reports the information. I don't agree nor disagree. Its data. You as a skeptic should be evaluating this data. It is reliable and reproducible scientific data. Dont you think that if you read this article that vaccines are dangerous?
it opened right up....don't know why others are having issues
this is the header....
Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there abiochemical or synergistic toxicity?
Neil Z Miller and Gary S Goldman
Hum Exp Toxicol published online 4 May 2011
“[Pertussis] infections are common in an immunized population…more prevalent than previously documented.” 98% were vaccinated in this population.
He Q, Vijanen MK, Arvilommi H et al. Whooping cough caused by Bordetella pertussi and Bordetella parapertussis in an immunized population. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280:635-637.
Outbreaks have occurred in 100% vaccinated populations.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. US Govt. 12/29/89/38(S-9):1-18.
80% cases of measles are contracted in vaccinated people.”
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. US Govt. 6/6/86/35(22):366-70.
“The increase in pertussis incidence was higher among vaccinated than among non-vaccinated persons of all ages.”
De Melker HE, Schellekens JFP, Neppelenbrock SE et al. Reemergence of pertussis in the highly vaccinated population of The Netherlands: Observations on surveillance data. Emerg