They failed to tackle these issues head-on but have successfully altered the framework of our society such-that all of those statements are now true if you swap man for woman.
The ironic thing is, most women *can't* take care of themselves on their own.
Most use, and require, a man's assistance.
That was the point that Feminist failed to accept.
Most believe that because they-themselves were capable that other women were capable as well and it must be /that man/ holding them back.
Except that man wasn't holding her back - he was propping her up.
This is/was/will-be why she will not leave him, because she is not capable of taking care of herself.
If she was there would not be a barrier to her leaving (thus she would).
The only reason so many women are able to severe their marriage today is do to our mother-support laws which legally require a man to take care of of his ex-wife.
"I don't know how women with families do it, to be honest. It makes me wonder if it is worth it to work... it would be so nice to stay home with the family."
Also a solid point missed my Feminist, they failed to recognize that the technical advancements of the late twentieth century lowered the level of work of SAHM to that of a prolonged vacation.
(i.e. It is not as though house-chores and children-rearing magically disappears if you have a job - you just have that much /more/ work to do.)
"I'm not sure that marriage will ever die. It's engrained in women's emotional makeup to "mate for life." Marriage came about and has lasted thousands and thousands of years for a reason..."
On this point you are off. The natural state of women is ultra-ultra-slutty. This is what Feminist lamented about the most - a man "ability" to sleep around and then marry whereas such a slutty women was deemed unmarriable. Everything in their agenda is designed to give women the freedom to sleep around as much as they want; since they are [theoretically] no longer dependent upon a man to survive, and since men [in general] have such high sex-drives, she now has as much sexual freedom as she wishes to take.
If young women are not heavily conditioned to repress their sexual urges then she grows-up and exercises them. In today's society this is exercised in the grotesquely high percentage of divorces initiated by women. She rationalizes that everything is "for the better" if she breaks her vows and ends her marriage prior to moving on to [yet] another man.
Divorce is so devastating to children this [new] common life-pattern is highly detrimental to our future society.
Which leads us to if a women refuses to take all of her vows, including "to obey", and/or has no issue with promiscuity then in all likelihood she will leave her husband within seven years of marriage (greater than a 45% probability).
Which is why marriage is the worst decision a man can make in his life.