there would be a civil war without slave?

there would be a civil war between the north and the south without slave

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Alex
    Lv 7
    9 years ago
    Best Answer

    No, slavery was the focus of the civil war. Reading the Declaration of Causes of Seceding States makes that very clear.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Industrialized agriculture of the South lead to the Civil War but without slaves that might of not of been the case so it that way no. On the other hand the Civil War was brought on by the north not wanting to break up the union. Butterfly effects are hard to project.

  • braker
    Lv 4
    3 years ago

    you're generally ideal. the civil conflict/ conflict between the states substitute into no longer approximately slavery. what's extra, many black volunteers (the two unfastened adult men and slaves) served interior the accomplice military- as armed infantrymen- in integrated units (together as the U. S. military demanded segregation from the very commence). evidence is interior the conflict of Gettysburg- the place black infantrymen made up approximately 5% of the adult men who made the "Pickett's can charge" (this is contemplated interior the numbers of those taken prisoner) few plantations paid their slaves. besides the incontrovertible fact that some slaves had a commerce (shoe maker, iron smith, etc) and have been employed to different plantations. the owner charged a fee and could enable the slave to maintain an element of it- and the two purchase his very own issues or acquire the money as a manner to purchase himself out. some plantation vendors used the comparable device with universal slaves- thus increasing their working means (the slave had something to look ahead to and his artwork could be rewarded) besides the incontrovertible fact that the actuality which you're ideal is previous the element because of the fact the stereotype of "confederacy = slavery = racism" is rampant (and additionally you're superb- this is because of the brainwashing performed in college). And which will make your public photograph. it won't count that the slaves sent to the Americas (north and south) made up decrease than 5% of the black human beings captured in Africa (something have been sent to Arabia and Algiers and extremely immediately died there). It does no longer count that muslims are racially segregated or that they enslaved 2 continents. it extremely is going to continually be "white guy's racism" and "accomplice/southern racism" So your accomplice tatoo will style you for all times. no longer precisely a good element in the experience that your next enterprise would be a brainwashed liberal. Having tatoos is likewise a foul element while you're thinking of the army or civil service in short- you're ideal. yet shop it under your hat (i'm from Poland and lived interior the socialist situations. conserving silent is now and returned the only determination)

  • 9 years ago

    Some people like to think that.

    The Republican Party was formed by abolitionists in the Whig party. Abraham Lincoln was the first President of the Republican party. He was a protege of John Quincy Adams who proposed anti slavery legislation regularly. Take slavery out, why would they go to war?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    The wars to bring the territory under control went on from the 1700's until now.

    Hawaii was stolen around 1900.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Of course.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    yes

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Properly format your question.

    F-

  • Boober
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    Absolutely there would, and for the same reasons.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Is that right?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.