Bye-Bye, Best Classical Album: Grammy Categories Cut?

Changes are in the works. Should we care?

"The American classical community doesn't have any other major honors that hold the same level of prestige or visibility as the Grammys, even if the classical winners were nothing more than a footnote that zipped by just before a commercial break during the televised ceremony."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/deceptivecadence/2011/04/...

It is obviously a done deal, but does it really matter? Certainly Classical (even modern classical, soundtracks, and video game music is a small segment of the music world. There are ardent admires who breathe the stuff. Without the (even minor exposure) of the Grammy's will it hasten the demise of culture?

... to be sure this comes on the heels of a radio format change leaving me with a single option rather than two. http://formatchange.com/102-1-kdfc-becomes-classic... (and yes, I do feel for music lovers who have no broadcast station in their area.)

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Best Answer

    On one hand I've never had any love for the Grammys because often the winners seem to have won as a result of either nepotism or ignorance on the part of the voters. Many great potential nominees never even make it to the ballot. Furthermore who ever really put any stock into a classical Grammy. Let's be Honest: who ever purchased a classical album because it won a Grammy?

    On the other hand even if was just a short 30-second blip on the awards show it was still exposing the idea of classical music to a wide audience of people who otherwise probably wouldn't realize. I'm for anything that gives classical music a wider exposure. Regarding the issue of "the demise of culture" i think this is only an the latest proof that the recording industry today only cares about money. 50 years ago many labels pulled money from their big pop money makers to produce classical albums that barely broke even because they liked the idea of the prestige, but today no record label does that because the name of the record label on album no longer carries much weight.

  • petr b
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    I'm in agreement with Nemesis. 'Trinkets, etc.'

    I think the grammys are an inside self-congratulatory bit of business, and do not influence the general public to or away from classical music. All the time they were awarded, only those already well in to consumption of classical music took note of them.

    Once upon a time, in brick and mortarland stores, while thumbing through LP's (I date myself) and later CD's ~ none of which you could audition in-store ~ a Grammy or Grand Prix du Disques banner might have helped tip my decision on which of several recorded performances to gamble my money upon.

    The one regrettable bit of this news is, perhaps, the industry not caring to name its more / most excellent endeavors. The vagaries of what has received grammys points out its non-importance, a standard bit of classical repertoire, already in print in 25 different recordings, now the latest and greatest performance and engineering, blah blah big whup, No thrill for me.)

    Now if you were talking of retiring the awarding of the New York Critics Circle awards, Pulitzers for Music (riddled with vagaries, anyone, including the composer, may nominate anyone for a Pulitzer), or the MacArthur Grants, I would be more than worried.

    Perhaps your attachment to following the Grammys is one of those 'guy-geek' dogmatic kind of affairs (I, a guy and oftentimes geek, am not immune ~ I just asked the most dogmatic of Q's on the categorization and 'labeling' of percussion sound ;-)

    My particular bias and enthusiasm has me a bit disappointed there will be no 'best new music' in the classical category. Though, that is not the way fans learn about new music, I would care more about that category loss than another award for another recording of the Verdi Requiem or a Mozart Symphony, to name a few typical 'new releases.'.

    Again, I don't think one classical grammy, ever, has worked magic on a body who had otherwise never purchased a classical recording. Ergo, commerce and culture aren't affected.

    Best regards.

  • 9 years ago

    While I largely agree with our esteemed colleagues Nemesis and petr b, I do, however, think it's a shame when ANYTHING happens that might remove (or at least obscure) classical music from the public gaze. Yes, these things are 'trinkets', but they do help to raise awareness of a genre that some perceive as dying (when will we get our next question along those lines, I wonder?).

    Of course, what constitutes 'classical' music in these things is sometimes dubious with the 'crossover brigade' being foisted upon us by the cynical (or ignorant?) marketeers as if it were real classical music (Kathryn Jenkins, Andre *blech* Rieu and their ilk), so perhaps it's largely irrelevant anyway whether there's a 'Best Classical Album'.

    While I regret this pruning, I doubt it heralds the end of civilisation as we know it.

  • 9 years ago

    While I am sympathetic to the notion that anything subtracted from contributing to the promotion of classical music is a bad thing, I have to say.... have you seen the most recent Grammy shows and what they are promoting in general? Have you taken a look at some of the cr@p they are giving awards for. If anything, THAT is what is detracting from any prestige such awards might have.

    The Grammys have become a joke.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 3 years ago

    very sturdy ingredient. easily, maximum followers have a very annoying tendency to nitpick and tear aside wrestlers who win greater advantageous than they lose. It happens in the two the boys's and girls's divisions. regrettably, Michelle McCool takes a lot of undeserved warmth because of the fact of that. you're good, I propose, why do no longer people harp on each and every of the giants? extremely, all of them rip off The Undertaker with their pass-contraptions. and how a lot of people use the vast boot now? The Undertaker, area, the vast instruct, the super Khali, Kane, Batista, Vladimir Kozlov, Mike Knox, Shad Gaspard...and that's basically off the top of my head, which includes Michelle McCool. Plus, i do no longer watch TNA so i do no longer understand approximately any of their men, yet nonetheless, whether the checklist is basically WWE-unique, it extremely is a ton of people good there. easily, each and every person wrestles a undeniable variety, and there are not that many distinctive wrestling varieties obtainable. so as because of the fact of this there are in elementary terms maximum of strikes which could be used. no person seems to bash Batista, yet his finished pass-set, and that i propose his finished pass-set, is basically thoroughly ripped off from different men. it extremely is not even diffused. The spear is utilized by utilising a ton of fellows (between others, now the vast instruct besides. you do no longer hear people complaining approximately that...), the spinebuster is stolen from Triple H and countless different others, the working powerslam grew to become right into a Goldberg and Kevin Nash staple. Then there is that suplex Batista does the place he holds the different guy super on the instant above his head for a on a similar time as (i do no longer understand the call of it). Goldberg used to try this each and every of the time. Oh, and a powerbomb as a finisher? Wow, now it is unique. easily, now that i think of of it, Bobby Lashley had a precise to comparable pass-set to Batista. maximum men (and girls) have a pass-set of between 7-10 accepted strikes. particular, on PPV's they are going to swap it up slightly, yet for the main area, they shop on with what they understand. There are exceptions, like the Undertaker and Kurt perspective, who've something like 15-20 unique strikes, yet that's a rarity. people could get off Michelle's decrease back. Plan and straightforward, she's been carrying the Smackdown divas roster for some years now, and that's a certainty. I want people could supply her a harm.

  • 9 years ago

    You're truly baffling me, boss, as I can easily see how it will possibly 'hasten the demise of' classical *commerce* but 'hasten the [*]demise of culture[*]'..??

    Trinkets, beads and 'gongs' have yet to hasten anything lasting, one way or the other, that I'm aware of. Might you care to edit, supplement, maybe............? :-)

    Warmly, as ever,

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.