standard relativity genuinely provided a contracting universe as a substitute of the then assumed stable universe ( Newton defined it by ability of asserting it rather is a limiteless universe with countless mass yet admitted that such may well be a precarious stability ). Einstein became into engaged on something detrimental to gravity to counter the contractive result to describe why the Universe nonetheless existed and hadn't only collapsed, it became into in lots of situations reported as antigravity interior the previous yet might now be reported as detrimental capability or darkish capability. whilst Hubble got here out with the assertion that the Universe became into increasing, then that eradicated the might desire to counter the contractive outcomes of gravity so Einstein dropped his antigravity suggestions and reported because it his best mistake. in spite of the undeniable fact that standard relativity might decelerate the expansion, the two to a give way or the expansion will grow to be extra effective than the outcomes of gravity, regardless with an increasing universe and standard relativity, the expansion might desire to be slowing down and modern observations say it is not any longer, it is accelerating, for this reason we've been dusting off Einstein's tossed away equations approximately anti-gravity and calling it detrimental capability. The remark you got here upon became into from 1922 and from an exceptionally distinctive perspective, it is likewise probable approximately Einstein's discussions of a accessible anti-gravity to counter the outcomes of gravity which may well be extra stable as an increasing universe than a stable universe. remember that lower back then, the thought that the universe did no longer constantly existed because it did then might've been unthinkable, to point that something reported an increasing or contracting universe may well be mocking the theory in 1922.