please help me with this assignment.?

In 1972, Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan said that “the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause, like the other great clauses of the Constitution, is not susceptible of precise definition. “ (Anderson & Gardner, p. 161). When the 8th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1791, what forms of punishment do you think the framers intended to be forbidden by this prohibition against cruel and unusual punishments? Do you think that capital punishment is cruel and unusual? Why or why not?

3 Answers

  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Standards of what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment have been evolving and lately, rapidly. For example, in 1989 the Supreme Court upheld (5-4) the constitutionality of executing those with intellectual disability in Penry v. Lynaugh (492 U.S. 302). The Court said "mental retardation" should be a mitigating factor to be considered by the jury during sentencing. Writing for the majority, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said that a "national consensus" had not developed against executing those with "mental retardation."

    However, in 2002, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling ending the execution of those with intellectual disability. In Atkins v. Virginia, the Court held that it is a violation of the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel unusual punishment to execute death row inmates with "mental retardation". The decision reflects the national consensus which has formed on this issue.

    The "evolving standards" test also applies to the constitutionality of executing people for crimes committed while younger than 18.

    More recently the debate on the death penalty has focused on other aspects including:

    The risk of executing innocent people

    The enormous costs

    Lack of deterrence

    Effect of the process on families of murder victims

    Alternative severe sentences (life without parole)



  • John M
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    I think the phrasing cruel and unusual was intended to allow the standard to change over time, as social mores changed. While hanging in the public square, or even at the sight of capture was once permitted in the wild west, we now find a public hanging to be unacceptable to public sentiments, even in a state where capital punishment is upheld by popular vote.

    I do not think capital punishment is cruel if it is administered to an adult convicted of crimes that include preying on weaker people. A classic case would be an adult killing a child after raping the child, for the purpose of the child being unable to testify against the adult. I have no problem with capital punishment in that case and many other cases. I do have a problem with the death penalty for all people convicted of murder. There are many cases where the act was not technically self defense, but a strong moral argument is made for the act being understandable given the circumstances and justice being available with a much lighter sentence. An example might be a young adult robbing a store due to a pressing need for his child or family member. The store owner pulls out a gun and fires a shot at the robber but misses. The robber returns fire and kills the owner. A crime yes, unacceptable behavior. But death as the sentence is going too far, in my opinion.

    I also think that it is unreasonable for society to be expected to house a young adult for his entire life in a high security facility because he has proven to be a danger to society through several separate actions, such as rape or severe physical assault. I think society has a right to conclude after enough chances, that a criminal is a hazard to society and is not going to reform, and that criminal should be eligible for the death penalty simply to protect society. In other words, life in prison with no chance for parole is an inappropriate sentence for many criminals. If there is no chance of the person being freed, then capital punishment may be appropriate in many, but not all cases.

  • potere
    Lv 4
    3 years ago

    a million) Mommy's catnip teabags isn't nutrition. 2) i can not elevate my leg to the stable-finding neighbour guy that Mommy is making an attempt to impression. 3) I know that the human's cats has a suited to exist. 4) the hose it somewhat is filling the kiddie pool isn't a toy. 5) i can not bite the nutrition left interior attain on the settee. 6) i can not bark at honestly no longer something (extremely after 11 PM). 7) i can not dig decrease than the sidewalk till it collapses. those are so ridiculous. in any case action picture star for you.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.