<<If abortion is legal, then how come countries that allow it consider killing a fetus a murder ?>>
Just because something it legal doesn't mean it's right.
<<If abortion is legal then we should assume that fetus is not a human.>>
There's a reason you can't spell 'assume' without '***'.
People who assume too much end up making asses of themselves.
<<But in countries <snip> murder, how come?>>
Doesn't make sense, does it - and yet, there you are advocating people merely ASSUME the government is right!
<<The contest of the woman, being legal, and the medical procedure is not excuse neither a difference. So it is either both are murder or both are NOT. Right ?>>
<<Marc, perhaps you are too id**t to understand the question and put the answer "Not">>
Ad hominem attacks hurt your credibility.
Perhaps Marc, like me, doesn't see too much in the way of credibility when reading your question.
<<mnwomen you are <snip> is NOT murder.>>
The term "fetus" literally means "the young in the womb". The fetus IS a living human being. Life begins at conception, not birth nor some arbitrary point in between. Therefore, every abortion constitutes the murder of an unborn human being.
<<If it is NOT human then killing it is NOT a murder.>>
But the fetus IS human. Therefore, abortion IS murder.
<<No difference between <snip> and stupid imagination.>>
What's so narrow minded about acknowledging the unborn for the living human beings they are? Since you're unable to do that, wouldn't that suggest your mind is in fact more narrow than mine?
<<Billy, did you <snip> person NOT two.>>
That just goes to show how schizophrenic human institutions can be - and you want to ASSUME such an institution (the government) is right.