Why are companies that funneled 22million dollars over five days to the GOP hiding their identities?
Aren't they proud to help a party that 'does good by the American people'?
Why would Americans boycott a company if the company was funneling money to a candidate who was doing the right thing by America? If Candidates are worried that people don't like their actions and would take it out on their contributors, why would they continue with these actions?
- mckenziecalhounLv 79 years agoBest Answer
Because of some of the unethical things political bigots do to companies that don't agree with their personal view of the United States.
Frankly, if we are going to do that, I suggest we pass a law forcing EVERY company or person donating to have their identities shared and people have access to these easily so the public can boycott whomever they choose and more, see the companies that do business with that organization (or non-profit).
You might find my party VERY upset with such a proposal.
Having all the non-profits that socialists have set up to interact with each other might be very upsetting to most people.
Progressive Coalition supporting socialist agenda
Americans for Democratic Action
Campaign for America's Future
Campaign for New Priorities
Center for the Advancement of Public Policy
Center of Concern
Coalition on Human Needs
Demilitarization for Democracy
50 Years is Enough Network
Friends of the Earth
Fund for New Priorities in America
Institute for Policy Studies
Institute for Women's Policy Research
International Labor Rights Fund
National Jobs for All Coalition
National Organization for Women
National Priorities Project
NETWORK: A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby
Preamble Center for Public Policy
Public Citizen, email: Public Citizen
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America
United for a Fair Economy
Washington Chapter Alliance for Democracy
Women, Law and Development
National Council of La Raza
The Campaign for Health Security
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Center for Defense Information
Council for a Livable World
Citizens for Tax Justice
U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines
Human Rights Watch
Americans for a Sustainable Economy
National Education Association
USA Network for Habitat II
National Council of ***** Women
Center for Law and Social Policy
Witness for Peace
Children's Defense Fund
Child Welfare League
National Black Child Development Institute
Economic Policy Institute
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
Defenders of Wildlife
Veterans for Peace
National Rainbow Coalition
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
Unitarian Universalist Service Committee
National Association of Public Hospitals
National Council of Senior Citizens
Long-Term Care Campaign
Center for Responsive Politics
Latin American Working Group
This particular coalition consists of social organizations that work hand-in-hand with other coalitions such as BIONET, CITNET, ECONET, PEACENET, the Climate Action Network (CAN), and others. All are connected through IGC-APC (Institute for Global Communications, and the Association of Progressive Communications). Virtually all of these organizations, including the Democratic Socialists of America, have web sites hosted by IGC-APC.
The policy gains that have been made in recent years on both the international and domestic fronts are largely the result of the communications capability of these organizations. Freedom.org was conceived more than five years ago to provide similar communications capability to organizations that are not socialists. The Property Rights Congress will be pioneering that new capability. Non-socialist organizations are far behind, and have much catching-up to do.
- 9 years ago
Why did Obama disable online address verification to accept untraceable campaign donations in 2008?
"Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is allowing donors to use largely untraceable prepaid credit cards that could potentially be used to evade limits on how much an individual is legally allowed to give or to mask a contributor’s identity, campaign officials confirmed. Faced with a huge influx of donations over the Internet, the campaign has also chosen not to use basic security measures to prevent potentially illegal or anonymous contributions from flowing into its accounts, aides acknowledged.”
- Anonymous9 years ago
Because whenever they are honest, some people try to start a boycott against their companies.