Why do we allow corporations to spend money freely on elections?

It honestly makes no sense to me that a special interest has the right to influence an election. How can this possibly be justified? Do people really think corporations should have the same rights as us humans?

7 Answers

  • 9 years ago
    Best Answer

    I think you miss the point.

    That is what a corporation is.

    That's how it is defined. It gives a group of people the same power as an individual in many ways, and you have the right to do it yourself.

    This isn't magic. It's a basic right.

    But if you think restricting their freedom is YOUR way, I'll tell you what true Democrats (not socialists) do.

    Oppose you.

    It's that simple.

    HOWEVER, if you plan to remove the power of all the non-profits as well to do the same thing...then feel free. That would be fair. After all...

    Progressive Coalition supporting socialist agenda

    Americans for Democratic Action

    Campaign for America's Future

    Campaign for New Priorities

    Center for the Advancement of Public Policy

    Center of Concern

    Coalition on Human Needs

    Demilitarization for Democracy

    Development GAP

    50 Years is Enough Network

    Friends of the Earth

    Fund for New Priorities in America

    Institute for Policy Studies

    Institute for Women's Policy Research

    International Labor Rights Fund

    National Jobs for All Coalition

    National Organization for Women

    National Priorities Project

    NETWORK: A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby

    Peace Action

    Preamble Center for Public Policy

    Public Citizen, email: Public Citizen

    Stakeholders Alliance

    United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

    United for a Fair Economy

    Washington Chapter Alliance for Democracy

    Working Assets

    Women, Law and Development

    National Council of La Raza

    The Campaign for Health Security

    Leadership Conference on Civil Rights

    Friends Committee on National Legislation

    Center for Defense Information

    Council for a Livable World

    Citizens for Tax Justice

    U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines

    Amnesty International

    Human Rights Watch

    Americans for a Sustainable Economy

    National Education Association

    USA Network for Habitat II

    Catholic Charities

    National Council of ***** Women

    Center for Law and Social Policy

    Witness for Peace

    Children's Defense Fund

    Child Welfare League

    National Black Child Development Institute

    Urban League

    Economic Policy Institute

    Brookings Institute

    Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

    National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

    Defenders of Wildlife

    Veterans for Peace

    National Rainbow Coalition


    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights


    Unitarian Universalist Service Committee

    National Association of Public Hospitals

    National Council of Senior Citizens

    Long-Term Care Campaign

    Consumer's Union

    Center for Responsive Politics

    Latin American Working Group

    Public Campaign

    This particular coalition consists of social organizations that work hand-in-hand with other coalitions such as BIONET, CITNET, ECONET, PEACENET, the Climate Action Network (CAN), and others. All are connected through IGC-APC (Institute for Global Communications, and the Association of Progressive Communications). Virtually all of these organizations, including the Democratic Socialists of America, have web sites hosted by IGC-APC.

    The policy gains that have been made in recent years on both the international and domestic fronts are largely the result of the communications capability of these organizations. Freedom.org was conceived more than five years ago to provide similar communications capability to organizations that are not socialists. The Property Rights Congress will be pioneering that new capability. Non-socialist organizations are far behind, and have much catching-up to do.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    That's perverse. Remember - it is the perverted power hungry politicians who make the the self-serving laws to finance their obscenely expensive election process. In that regard the US is an outstanding country.

    In Canada that type of election funding is outlawed. Here a rich corporation has as much say or clout as a single individual who makes $2000 a month in regards to election donation(s). I think it is a $500 limit per entity which is tax deductible.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    since a "corporation" is SOLELY responsible for the LIVES of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of individuals, yes. Political decisions that hurt business can potentially destroy the lives of the average sheep who doesnt know that his vote basically just slit his own throat. Business decisions are made by a very few very smart people. The common voter cant possibly be expected to know how to vote properly.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    There are federal election rules that prohibit this. Yet much of Clinton's and Obama's funding came from foriegn sources.

    Go figure.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    Because we allow unions to do the same thing.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    UNFORTUNATELY the supreme court ruled they could.

    it was a case that should NEVER have bee brought up

    it clearly was a ruling to allow big money to buy american (votes not production)

    Source(s): I support a constitutional Amendment as necessary to stop it
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.