Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 10 years ago

Do you agree with Al Gore that Bush really dropped the ball by not taking out Saddam since he has WMD and?

houses terrorists?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64

Youtube thumbnail

&feature=PlayList&p=CFA0E2E7C1C97352&index=6

Update:

Watch the video, Franco

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Franco Potanco, Put down the crack pipe!

    "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

    --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

    "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

    --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

    "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

    --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

    "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

    --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

    "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

    Letter to President Clinton, signed by:

    -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

    "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

    -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

    "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

    -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

    "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

    Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

    "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."

    -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

    "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

    -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

    "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

    "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

    -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

    "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

    "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

    "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"

    -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

    "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

    -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

    "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

    -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

    "Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."

    -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 200

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 10 years ago

    Fact 1: Iraq never had WMD and US knew that.

    Fact 2: Iraq did not house terrorists. They were hosted by Pakistan,and US their loyal friend knew that.

    Fact 3: Iraq had one the largest and best quality oil reserves, AND US KNEW THAT.

    So Saddam had to pay. And yes, now that US are the de facto rulers of Iraq, it has become a hot bed of terrorists.

    Source(s): //
    • Login to reply the answers
  • 10 years ago

    Do you really want to back anything that Al says? Really? Do you know who this guy is? Doesn't it RUB you the wrong way to agree with a guy who thinks global warming is real? I don't blame Al for the GB stuff. He made a hundred million dollars off of something that does not exist.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • molly
    Lv 7
    10 years ago

    We all know Bush snr dropped the ball on Saddam thats why Bush jnr had to clean up after him but it wasn't real smart to do it just as the world was on the verge of WW3.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 10 years ago

    Yes that was the one and only time I have agreed with Gore

    Source(s): May God Bless you and keep us all safe from the progressive axis of evil,0bama,Pelosi&Reid
    • Login to reply the answers
  • 10 years ago

    Bush dropped the ball/bomb by lying us into war on the false assertions by he and others in his administration that Iraq likely possessed Nuclear Weapons, or was soon to, or had other chemical weapons, in his march to lie us into a war to avenge his daddy... the quotes you're looking at are from a previous era, when Iraq did have chemical weapons, and was pursuing a nuclear program... Bush knew that no WMDs were in Iraq, and there were no strong connections to Al-Qaeda. He should be rotting in prison right now, if not executed, along with his fellow war criminal, Saddam.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    You realize that Iraq had WMD's before the gulf war but not after?

    And explain why america couldn't just destroy iraqs hypothetical weapons programs from the air without invading? (it may have something to do with them not existing)

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 10 years ago

    That was a while ago...Im hoping people can now recognize retards when they see them !

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 10 years ago

    BUSH PRETTY MUCH LEFT THIS COUNTRY IN RUINS. I DON'T KNOW IF THIS COUNTRY CAN BE SAVED.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.