Who does more selective editing of the facts? Michael Moore or Andrew Breitbart?

Update:

Let's face it. They're both guilty. Which one has mastered the art? Which one can bend the truth more effectively?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Breitbart. He's a lying, degenerate, depraved Nazi filth. And he claims to provide "information" on his insane website.

    Moore is in the film as entertainment business. He's never done, or even pretended to do journalism. Breitbart is a maggot parasite liar. And Moore's distortions really ARE intended to be funny.

  • 1 decade ago

    Moore has a 2 hour movie to work with. Breitbart has to keep his work down to a few minutes. So Breitbart edits because that is the nature of what he is doing. Cutting it down to the essence, as he preceives it. Now that is where bias comes in, but he isn't as deceptive as MSNBC.

    Moore has a lot of time. He has the chance to present both sides But he doesn't because because that doesn't fit into his agenda.

    So even if they are equally biased, I would say Moore is worse because he has more of an opportunity to present both sides but chooses not to

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I think Michael Moore has a longer history of it, but Breitbart can be right up there if he keeps trying hard enough lol.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm surprised Fox News hasn't offered Michael Moore a job. I mean, they are fair and balanced. The only thing they're missing is anyone who isn't a die hard conservative.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    I would have to go with Moore simply because his target audience is far more easily led, therefore concrete facts, or the lack thereof as the case is, presents no obstacle.

  • 1 decade ago

    AB showed actual tape... MM talks about his opinion.

    Nuf sed!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.