Why Turkey Constitution provides a single nationality designation as "Turks" and does not Recognize "KURDS"?

According to the World Factbook, in 2010 approximately 25 percent of Turkey's population consists of Kurdish ethnic minority. Turkey's Constitution provides a single nationality designation for all Turks and thus does not recognize Kurdish ethnic group as national, racial, or ethnic minorities. Therefore a true census has been historically unavailable.

Citizens of Kurdish origin have constituted a large ethnic and linguistic group in Turkey. Millions of the country's citizens identified themselves as Kurds and spoke Kurdish. Kurds who publicly or politically asserted their Kurdish identity or publicly espoused using Kurdish in the public domain risked public censure, harassment, or prosecution. However, Kurds who were long-term residents in industrialized cities in the west were in many cases assimilated into the political, economic, and social life of the nation, and much intermarriage has occurred over many generations.

The Kurds have been the minority group with the greatest impact on Turkish national politics.In Turkey, the Kurdish national movement dates back to at least 1925, when Atatürk ruthlessly suppressed a revolt against the new Turkish republic motivated by the regime's renunciation of Muslim religious practices. Uprisings in the 1930s and 1940s prompted by opposition to the modernizing and centralizing reforms of the Turkish government in Ankara also were also put down by the Turkish army. The majority of Kurds, however, continued to participate in Turkish political parties and to assimilate into Turkish society.

Since the 1930s, Kurds have resisted government efforts to assimilate them forcibly, including an official ban on speaking or writing Kurdish. Since 1984 Kurdish resistance to Turkification encompassed both a peaceful political struggle to obtain basic civil rights for Kurds within Turkey and a violent armed struggle to obtain a separate Kurdish state. The leaders of the nonviolent struggle have worked within the political system for the recognition of Kurdish cultural rights, including the right to speak Kurdish in public and to read, write, and publish in Kurdish. Prior to 1991, these Kurds operated within the national political parties, in particular the SHP, the party most sympathetic to their goal of full equality for all citizens of Turkey. President Özal's 1991 call for a more liberal policy toward Kurds and for the repeal of the ban on speaking Kurdish raised the hopes of Kurdish politicians. Following the parliamentary elections of October 1991, several Kurdish deputies, including Hatip Dicle, Feridun Yazar, and Leyla Zayna, formed the HEP, a party with the explicit goal of campaigning within the National Assembly for laws guaranteeing equal rights for the Kurds.

The government's main strategy for assimilating the Kurds had been language suppression. Yet, despite official attempts over several decades to spread Turkish among them, most Kurds have retained their native language. In Turkey two major Kurdish dialects are spoken: Kermanji, which is used by the majority of Kurds, as well as by some of the Kurds in Iran and Iraq; and Zaza, spoken mainly in a triangular region in southeastern Turkey between Diyarbakir, Ezurum, and Sivas, as well as in parts of Iran. Literate Kurds in Turkey have used Kermanji as the written form of Kurdish since the 17th century. However, almost all literary development of the language since 1924 has occurred outside Turkey. In 1932 Kurds in exile developed a Latin script for Kermanji, and this alphabet continued to be used in the mid-1990s.

Prior to the 1980 military coup, government authorities considered Kurdish one of the unnamed languages banned by law. Use of Kurdish was strictly prohibited in all government institutions, including the courts and schools. Nevertheless, during the 1960s and again in the mid-1970s, Kurdish intellectuals attempted to start Kurdish-language journals and newspapers. None of these publications survived for more than a few issues because state prosecutors inevitably found legal pretexts for closing them down. Between 1980 and 1983, the military government passed several laws expressly banning the use of Kurdish and the possession of written or audio materials in Kurdish.

1 Answer

  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Kurd is not a name of a nation.

    Kurd (which means wolf in Turkish) is a name arbitrarily given to the people who speak around 400 primitive, patched up languages which are not sufficient to establish communication beyond a village or a town (at most) and who have no social, cultural and historical bonds with each other.

    It's important to note that in none of those languages (which are claimed to be linked with each other) spoken by these people there's neither a word like ''Kurd'' nor any word derived from the word of ''Kurd'' (nor any common name those people who speak these''languages'' give themselves in their own languages).

    With these patched up languages (which are made up with the intention of establishing communication between the locals whose mother tongues are different due to social necessities in history) you can't talk about politics, you can't write about history, you can't make university education.

    It's physically impossible to make these 400 primitive patched up languages, which are wrongly lumped together under the name of Kurdish, education language (any such attempt would mean the assimilation of the rest of the 399 languages which deserve to exist just like the language which is tried to be imposed upon those people who all speak different languages.

    PKK is a Marxist terrorist organization who makes an armed struggle in order to make a communist revolution in Turkey by invoking whatever resources available including instigating ethnic racism by introducing it as a legitimate struggle of getting rights for a nation which literally doesn't exist.

    Minority racism doesn't promote peace. It only serves the interests of the imperialist nations who still live with the dreams of 19th century colonialism even in the 21st century. These terrorists fight for the interests of neo-colonialist nations as they're paid by them.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.